It is only at the actual AGM that the number of trustees for the ensuing year is decided upon and therefore it will not be clear whether or not the nominations received before the meeting are sufficient to fill the number of trustee positions until this decision has been made. If the number of nominations received before the AGM equals the number of trustees decided upon at the AGM then there will be no need for a vote at the meeting, as the duly nominated persons will simply fill these positions. However, PMR 5 requires that the majority of trustees be owners or spouses of owners and therefore if amongst the nominations received before the meeting there are more non-owners than owners or spouses of owners, further nominations may need to be called for at the meeting so as to comply with this requirement.
A student recently raised the following interesting scenario which takes the matter further:
If four trustee nomination forms are received 48 hours before the AGM, three of which are for non-owners and one for an owner, and if the meeting then decides there will be seven trustees, can the chairperson ask the meeting for only three more nominations, insisting that all further nominations be of owners – or must the chairperson accept all further nominations from the floor?
The answer is that all further nominations must be accepted from the floor, regardless of whether these are for owners or non-owners. If the chairperson limits the further nominations to only three persons who must be owners then s/he would be prejudicing all the other potential nominees. The argument that only three owners should be nominated at the meeting to fill in the vacant trustee positions presupposes that the four persons nominated before the meeting will fill positions as trustees. The persons who were nominated before the AGM are not in a privileged position due to the fact that their nominations were lodged earlier than those persons nominated at the meeting. If there are insufficient prior nominations to fill the number of trustee positions decided upon at the meeting or the number of owner trustee nominations is not sufficient to form a majority of the total number of trustees the members have decided will be elected, the chairperson must call for further nominations and all the nominated persons in the category of owners (or their spouses) and non-owners, regardless of when they were nominated, must be given an equal opportunity to be elected.
Once all the nominations have been given, the meeting must vote. Once the votes have been tallied, the chairperson must check how many of the trustee candidates are owners or spouses of owners and how many are non-owners. If the number of non-owners outweighs the number of owners or spouses of owners then the non-owner trustee candidate with the lowest number or least value of votes must be eliminated and this process must be repeated until the correct number of trustees is achieved with the majority being owners or their spouses.
Jennifer Paddock is a sectional title expert. Click here to see the schedule of training courses, or for free sectional title advice go to www.sto.co.za.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
9 Comments.
Hello, please can you advise. Can the nomination of an owner as a trustee be vetoed? How must an objection be presented? Our complex had 22 homes, approx half either rented out or holiday homes. The atmosphere in the complex, between the owners is toxic. I would like to propose a management company be appointed instead of having trustees. Or a split between both- trustees elected who live on the estate, to manage the sewerage system and finances. The rest with independent management. I appreciate your feedback .
Dear Gill,
Thank you for your comment. We are more than happy to help, however we do not give free opinions / advice. Please email us on consulting@paddocks.co.za with regards to your matter, and we can provide you with a no-obligation quote, so that we can assist you. Alternatively, join us on http://www.paddocks-club.co.za.
Kind regards,
Paddocks
May a current Trustee nominate him/herself for the next year?
Dear Liesl,
Thank you for your comment. We are more than happy to help, however we do not give free opinions / advice. We do offer a 10-minute consultation telephonically for R390. If you are interested, please email consulting@paddocks.co.za.
Kind regards,
Paddocks
Hi Gill
I recently resigned as a trustee as the two other trustees were blatantly breaking the rules.
A 3rd trustee was appointed by the remaining 2 trustees without any meeting/notice or advice to the BC.
Is this constitutional?
BR
Joe
We have a situation we were elected 5 trustees at the AGM, a few months later 3 trustees resigned. The 2 trustees then co op an outsider with no vested interest in our complex. We now have 3 trustees of which 1 is an owner the other one the spouse of an owner and the 3rd trustee who is a non owner. Is this legal?
Hi Zeena,
Thank you for your comment. We would love to help, however we do not give free advice. Here’s how we can help:
– We offer a 1-week Free Basics of Sectional Title short course.
– We offer consulting via telephone for R490 for 10 minutes. Please call us on 021 686 3950.
– We have Paddocks Club, an exclusive online club, to help you get answers to your questions about community schemes.
Kind regards,
Paddocks
Hi I live in a block of flats which is sectional title, the treasurer and secretary nominated themselves, no written nominations, all decisions are made by the treasurer, the secretary has previously served on the board and made decisions of grave concern and also handed over to the new committee with no funds available,condition of building is of grave concern, nothing is being done to uplift the building. there are funds available from previous treasurer, but the are demand funds for every project from owners, they have even asked a student auditor working for a company who is known to one of them and submitted a report with no accreditation from the auditor no company name , just her name and surname, can you please assist with some information on this issue
Hi Mumsie,
Thank you for your comment. Please note that our legal team would need to advise you on this matter. Please send the details through to consulting@paddocks.co.za, and the team will provide a no-obligation quotation for their assistance with your query.
Kind regards
Paddocks