One of the more frequently complained about aspects of sectional title management is the unauthorised spending of body corporate funds by the trustees or the scheme’s managing agent. Now that South Africans are forced to face the grave economic impact of COVID-19 and the national lockdown, the need to tighten the belt on our own spending, and to pay careful attention to how others spend our hard-earned money, has become paramount.
Let’s take a closer look at the funds into which your levies are paid and the circumstances in which the trustees may spend these funds.
The administrative fund:
This fund must be used by the body corporate to cover the following costs:
- Common property repairs, maintenance, management and administration.
- Rates, taxes and other municipality charges for the supply of electricity, gas, water, fuel, sanitary and/or other services to the building or land.
- Insurance premiums relating to the building or land.
- Fulfilling any of the body corporate’s other obligations and/or duties.
Money may only be paid out of this fund if:
- Such cost is provided for in the budget which has been approved by the majority of the body corporate’s members at the last AGM and
- Such payment is authorised by a trustee resolution.
The reserve fund:
This fund must be used by the body corporate to cover the costs of future maintenance and repairs of common property.
Money may only be paid out of this fund if:
- Such cost is provided for in the body corporate’s maintenance, repair and replacement plan, which has been approved by the majority of its members and such payment is authorised by a trustee resolution; or
- The trustees have passed a resolution that the payment is necessary to have urgent maintenance, repairs or replacement done.
This “urgent maintenance, repairs or replacement” could include:
- Those necessary to comply with a court or adjudication order;
- Those requiring immediate action (and therefore expenditure) to ensure safety or prevent significant loss or damage to persons or property;
- Those that could not reasonably have been foreseen in preparing the maintenance, repair and replacement plan; and/or
- Those required to enable the body corporate to obtain adequate insurance.
The amount(s) that the body corporate may spend on such “urgent maintenance, repairs or replacement” is limited to:
- The amount necessary to achieve the purpose for which it is being spent; and
- any limitation imposed by the body corporate on expenditure.
When the trustees spend money on such “urgent maintenance, repairs or replacement”, they must comply with any restrictions imposed or directions given by members and must report to the members on any such expenditure as soon as possible after it is made.
If you are a trustee or managing agent, making payments on behalf of a body corporate, make sure you have ticked the relevant boxes set out above, to ensure that payments are made legally. In times like these, you are likely to be monitored even more closely by penny-pinching body corporate members.
Article reference: Paddocks Press: Volume 15, Issue 10.
Specialist Community Scheme Attorney (BA (Law) LLB), Ané de Klerk, is a senior associate at The Advisory, a boutique law firm specialising exclusively in community scheme law:. Get in touch with her at www.theadvisory.co.za.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
7 Comments.
Thank-you for this handy reference regarding the control of funds.
There is another source of revenue available to us, as is the case with some other sectional titles retirement villages. We refer to it as an “endowment”. It is a percentage of the difference between the purchase price and the selling price attained on the sale of a section. Before the STSMA was brought into force, this income took the place of what is now the “reserve fund”. As a result, we have never in our history had to raise a special levy. The interest earned on these funds, is credited to our administrative fund, leading to lower levies.
There seems to be no regulation regarding the use of such funds, although we have sought the approval of our members before dipping into this kitty.
ADMINISTRATIVE FUND: we are a village of 270 Units. Our annual Admin Budget is close to R 4 million. It is totally impractical to have EVERY payment made in the process of administering the village approved by Trustee resolution and Minuted accordingly.
LEGAL GENERALLY: Many aspects of the STSMA are completely impractical in a large village. By the same token many of the legal obligations placed on Trustees in small developments (say 6 houses or flats) are onerous and expensive to adhere to. It is time to overhaul this legislation in the light of experience gained in the last five years.
Hi. Is there an Act or document to which managing agents should comply to? Furthermore, if a managing agent failed to recover or include some levy costs such as common property water, electricity and sewerage on the monthly levy statements, can they be held responsible for the under recoveries, and or is this the trustees liability and responsibility? thank you.
Hi Kobus,
Thank you for your comment. Please note that our legal team would need to assist you with your query. Please send the details of the matter to consulting@paddocks.co.za and the team will provide a no-obligation quotation for their assistance with this.
Kind regards
The Paddocks Team
Thank you for the relevant information. I agree with Rod Gush. It is time to realize that one size does not fit all. I have also found that managing agents try to play “god” and use their own interpretation to intimidate owners regarding rules and regulations.
Hi I am a trustee in a body corp recently elected at AGM. we have come across payments by the previous trustees to a contractor. there is no minutes at trustees meetings authorising such payments. there is only emails by two trustees to the managing agent to pay sixty percent deposit and later a final payment. These payments have been made to the contractor even though the job has not been completed
what can I do to recover this money either by the trustees. we have tried to talk to the contractor without success
The very trustees that made these payments did ask the the same contractor to requote to complete the job
When you have all the evidence, take it to an attorney and ask for advice as to whether the BC has a claim, based on an analysis of the documents you have.