By Peter Newmarch
The KwaZulu-Natal Planning and Development Act No. 6 of 2008 came in to force on 1 May 2010. This Act is commonly referred to as simply the “PDA”. Recent amendments have been published for comment which have a direct impact on sectional title.
In drawing up this Act, legislators provided for due public process, transparency and fairness as well as offences for transgression of this Act: no longer a mere slap-on-the-wrist fine, they now constitute criminal offences punishable by up to 5 years in jail.
Zoning issues
Everybody hears stories of zoning problems – people operating a small business from a residential area, or building without approved building plans. To compound the problem, there is a perception that little or nothing can be done to stop the problem – people simply ignore warnings or pay the fine and continue as normal. This is no longer the case: people will now face the prospect of a criminal conviction and a heavy jail sentence or hefty fine for non-compliance with the Act.
The current Act (from 1 May 2010) only had implications for property owners if they undertook unapproved building activities or conducted an activity contrary to what the town planning scheme allowed for that property.
With the publication of the proposed amendments to the Act, the right to establish a sectional title scheme has now been added and thus a developer or owner would need to apply for permission to establish a sectional title scheme over a piece of land in the future, if the amendments are passed. Not only this, but once a sectional title scheme has been established and is operating, any extension or alteration to the scheme or the granting of any exclusive use areas would need the consent of the municipality. This consent is not the same as the building application process, it is completely different and a separate application under the PDA would need to be made, unless of course you fancy the prospect of a 5-year jail sentence.
Shareblock
It is interesting to note, that people living in a shareblock do not need to comply with the PDA, other than the normal approved building plan process. Of course, violations of the town planning scheme would still attract the penalties as specified in the PDA.
Its hard to comprehend why an owner of a house on a freehold property, or for that matter somebody in a shareblock, should not need to apply for some building additions under the PDA, but under the proposed amendments an owner in a sectional title scheme does have to apply for the right, irrespective of whether the building plans have been approved or not.
What does this mean?
• Comply or face the prospect of a criminal record and a heavy fine or 5 years in jail.
• Budget extra for any building additions you may be doing and face the prospect of a lengthy wait (even when your have approved building plans).
• Trustees should be extra vigilant of their actions.
• If owners or trustees have concerns, they should consult with an attorney or a land surveyor about what is needed.
Selling units
Situations could arise where a person wants to sell their unit after making some additions but has not complied with the proposed amendments (i.e., their sectional plan was never updated) – entering in to even a sale agreement without PDA approval for the additions would constitute a criminal offence in terms of this Act (even though you have approved building plans).
The proposed amendments are most certainly to be challenged before the legislature as they raise a fundamental issue of why ownership is (by virtue of a sectional title scheme) a planning issue and somehow needs control when other forms of ownership do not need such permission. Surely if a town planning scheme allows multiple-dwelling status, then planning should have no further control on how each dwelling is owned.
I assume, like me, many of you feel this is going overboard and there must be a simpler way of enforcing planning and development compliance in our municipalities. Please remember that some aspects of the PDA I have mentioned are already in force, others specific to sectional title are proposed and subject to comment which closes 6 August 2010 – all of which only applies to people living in KwaZulu-Natal.
(a) by post, to –
The Head of Department
Co-operative Government and Traditional Affairs
Private Bag X9078
PIETERMARITZBURG
3200(b) delivery by hand to –
Office 108
14th Floor
North Tower
Natalia Building
330 Langalibalele Street
PIETERMARITZBURG;
(c) via facsimile to 033-394 9714; or
(d) via electronic mail to gert.roos@kznlgta.gov.za.
All comments must be received by no later than 6 August 2010 and must be marked clearly: “For Attention: Mr GL Roos”.
All enquiries and requests for copies of the Bill and the Memorandum on the Objects of the Bill must be addressed to:
Mr G Roos
Tel: (033) 395 2656/ (072) 624 4070
Fax: (033) 394 9714
Email: gert.roos@kznlgta.gov.za
Recent Posts
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
Recent Comments