There are two possible routes to getting this done, depending on whether the parking bays are unregulated common property or exclusive use areas. It is more likely that parking bays are exclusive use areas.
Exclusive use areas:
An owner may make an improvement to the area over which he or she holds rights of exclusive use, but only with the consent of the trustees. The trustee may not withhold their consent unreasonably, so they need to consider the implications of such a request very carefully. The most obvious implication is that once one owner has a carport, others will want one too. The trustees must therefore consider the overall effect on the scheme of having all the parking bays covered.
At this stage, it seems obvious to consult the body corporate for a general approval of the idea and the look of the carports, and get a conduct rule passed to lay out the specifications and design that must be followed. A secondary benefit of making a rule governing the installation of carports is that the trustees would not need to be consulted before each new carport is installed. In preparation, the trustees should consult local contractors to see what designs and materials are available and the cost of each. The contractors would also know whether the local authority requires building plans.
Unregulated common property:
If the parking bays are unregulated common property, the only way of having carports installed is to make them an improvement to the common property. Carports would almost certainly constitute a luxurious improvement and therefore a unanimous resolution would be needed to approve their installation. One owner unable or unwilling to pay the required share of the cost could prevent the resolution being taken.
It would be a better idea to make the parking bays subject to exclusive use rights. A conduct rule could be used to create these rights, requiring only a special resolution. Both rules could be made at one meeting where the body corporate agrees a design and installation specification together with creating the exclusive use rights.
Article reference: Paddocks Press: Volume 6, Issue 9, Page 1
Anton Kelly is one of the course conveners of the University of Cape Town (Law@Work) Sectional Title Scheme Management course. Next course starts, 5 December 2011. For more information please contact Emma on 021 447 4130 or emma@paddocks.co.za. Sign up and pay before 30 September 2011 and save R750.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
13 Comments.
Immediate adjacent property built illegal storeroom against dividing wall in cluster development. Council stopped completion years ago (2002) as building quota exceeded. Thereafter, Council repeatedly ”could not find” plans for this entire property. Property recently sold and new owner has now completed and roofed the storeroom and refuses to apply for plans and approval by both the HOA and/or the City Council – says it is not his problem. Total eyesore. HOA not supportive. What action needs to be done, or should it be accepted to prevent contention?
Appreciate your advice.
Hi there,
This is unfortunately outside the scope of quick, free advice. I have forwarded your matter to our consulting team, who will discuss this and get back to you with a quote.
Kind regards,
Paddocks
Good day
I am an owner in a small sectional title complex with only 12 units. We have 3 gates where 1 gate services 2 units only and another 2 gates in a L- shape ( one gate on either side of the L – legs) my unit is the corner unit and I already have one carport but would like to make a double carport. all other units in the complex have lovely large double carports but the majority of the owners are not allowing me to extend my carport. None of the area where their carports are erected is exclusive use. What could I do in this case. Regards
Hi Bjorn,
Firstly, you would need to determine the legal nature of the area upon which the existing carport is built as well as the area you propose the carport to be extended onto i.e. common property, EUA, part of section, section, subject to a lease.
If the area is common property, you will need to make an application in writing to the trustees in terms of Prescribed Conduct Rules 4 and 5 of Annexure 9 of the Regulations to the Sectional Titles Act 95 of 1986. If it is an exclusive use area, you will need to make an application in writing to the trustees in terms of Prescribed Management Rule 68(1)(vi) of Annexure 8 of the Regulations to the Sectional Titles Act.
If it is part of your section, or a section of its own, and you wish to extend onto common property, you will need to follow the process set out in Section 24 of the Sectional Titles Act and obtain a special resolution of the owner.
Thanks,
Paddocks
Good day,
We requested permission to erect a carport from our managing agent in 2015, who in turn discussed it with the trustees and emailed us back and said that we could go ahead as long as it looks the same as the rest of the existing carport, which we did. We used the same contractor that did all the other installations. They now threaten us with legal action as they said we were supposed to have approved plans. We did submit our sketches to the managing agent as they were supposed to do a bulk submission, which they did not do. Do we need approved plans? The parking bays are for exclusive use of the owners. Are we in the wrong?
Dear Amanda,
Thank you for your comment. We are more than happy to help, however we do not give free opinions / advice. Please email us on consulting@paddocks.co.za with regards to your matter, and we can provide you with a no-obligation quote, so that we can assist you.
Kind regards,
Paddocks
Hi, I am a trustee of a small complex (14 Units). Each unit has a dedicated parking bay for exclusive use. We as trustees allowed some units in the complex to have awnings erected in their yard (I take it that this is common property for exclusive use). I have approached the rest of the trustees asking for the permission to erect an awning on my parking bay. My parking bay is completely out of view to the public. My unit is the second last unit in the lower tier and the parking area is located in the area of the last unit. The last unit belongs to one of the trustees. I approached him and he told me that he has no problem for me to have the awning erected. The other two trustees told me that we should take a vote at the AGM. I would like to know what is my legal right as the two trustees has ganged up together as they are related. ps. I told them that the awning will by erected with the same material as what was used in the one trustee’s yard. The job will be done by professionals.
Dear Sir/Madam,
Thank you for your comment. We are more than happy to help, however we do not give free opinions / advice. Please email us on consulting@paddocks.co.za with regards to your matter, and we can provide you with a no-obligation quote, so that we can assist you. Alternatively, join us on http://www.paddocks-club.co.za.
Kind regards,
Paddocks
Dear Paddock
Can a home owners associate stop me from installing a carport on my property? I have indicated to the HOA and they summarily dismissed me. I have consulted my immediate neighbours and they have in writing indicated that they have no objections.
Hi Sri,
Thank you for your comment. We would love to help, however we do not give free advice. Here’s how we can help:
– We offer a 1-week Free Basics of Sectional Title short course.
– We offer consulting via telephone for R490 for 10 minutes. Please call us on 021 686 3950.
– We have Paddocks Club, an exclusive online club, to help you get answers to your questions about community schemes.
Kind regards,
Paddocks
Dear Paddocks
The carports in my complex were erected when the complex was built. Now the wooden trusses under the carports have rotten and need to be replaced. Who’s responsibility is it to pay for this maintenance?
Can a body corporate get exclusive use carports registered to an owners section?
Hi Charmaine,
Thank you for your comment. Our legal team would need to assist with this query. Please send the details of your matter to consulting@paddocks.co.za and the team will provide a no-obligation quote for their assistance with your matter.
Kind regards
Paddocks