Meetings in community schemes are the forum where resolutions are taken affecting all aspects of the scheme, and its members. If all the formalities of a meeting are not followed correctly, the decisions taken at that meeting could be challenged and even found invalid. The UCT Sectional Titles Meetings short course deals extensively with all facets of the law applicable to sectional title meetings.
This article takes a look at the quorum requirements and voting procedures at annual general meetings (“AGMs”) and special general meetings (“SGMs”), as provided for by the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act 8 of 2011 (“the STSMA”) and Prescribed Management Rules (“PMRs”).
Quorum and representation
Before any items of business at an AGM or SGM can be dealt with by the members of the body corporate or their representatives, a quorum of members must be present, either personally, or represented by proxy. A member may be represented by a proxy, in terms of section 6(5) of the STSMA, provided that a person may not hold proxies for more than 2 members.
PMR 19 provides that the quorum for an AGM or SGM, where a special resolution will be tabled, is determined in accordance with the number of primary sections within the scheme.
In a scheme with less than 4 primary sections or members, the prescribed quorum requirement is attendance in person or by proxy, of members who are entitled to vote, and hold two thirds of the total value of the votes of all members in the scheme. Whereas, in a scheme of more than 4 primary sections or members, the prescribed quorum requirement is attendance in person or by proxy, of members who are entitled to vote, and hold one third of the total value of the votes of all members in the scheme.
At least 2 persons must be present at the meeting, unless all the sections in the scheme are registered in the name of one person. Furthermore, the value of votes of the developer, and of any sections registered in the name of the body corporate, must not be taken into account when determining the quorum at a meeting.
Should a quorum not be present within 30 minutes from the time indicated on the notice calling the meeting, the meeting stands adjourned to the same day of the following week, at the same venue, and at the same time. Should a quorum not be present at the adjourned meeting within 30 minutes from the time indicated as above, the members present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum and the business of the meeting will proceed.
Should a unanimous resolution be tabled for approval at a meeting, there is a raised quorum requirement of 80%, calculated in both number and value, of the votes of all members of the body corporate.
Voting
In terms of section 6(6) of the STSMA, when votes are calculated in value (according to participation quota (“PQ”)), each member’s vote is calculated either as the total PQ of all sections (primary and utility) owned by the member, or in accordance with a rule made in terms of section 10(2) of the STSMA, setting a determination other than PQ. When votes are calculated in number, each member has one vote, in terms of section 6(7) of the STSMA.
PMR 20 sets out the procedure and requirements for valid voting to take place at duly convened and quorate AGM and SGM. A motion put forward for a vote at a meeting, no longer requires to be seconded before being taken to a vote. Ordinary resolutions must be adopted by the majority of the votes, calculated in PQ, of the members present at the meeting and voting.
A member is not entitled to vote on ordinary resolutions if they fail or refuse to pay the body corporate any amount due after a court or adjudicator has given a judgment or order for payment of that amount; or if they persist in the breach of any of the conduct rules of the body corporate after a court or an adjudicator has ordered that they refrain from breaching the conduct rules. This disqualification does not apply to special or unanimous resolutions.
The outcome of each vote, including the number of votes for and against the resolution, must be announced by the chairperson and recorded in the minutes of the meeting.
Should a special resolution be passed at an AGM or SGM by 75%, calculated in number and PQ, of a quorum representing less than 50% of the total PQ of all members in the scheme, the body corporate must not take any action to implement the special resolution for a period of 1 week following the meeting where the special resolution was passed, unless the trustees resolve that there are reasonable grounds to believe that immediate action is necessary to ensure safety or prevent significant loss or damage to the scheme. Members holding at least 25% of the total votes, calculated according to PQ, of all members in the scheme, may within 7 days from the passing of the special resolution, by written and signed request delivered to the body corporate, require that the body corporate hold a SGM to reconsider the special resolution. At which time, the trustees must not implement the special resolution, unless it is again passed by special resolution, or a quorum is not present within 30 minutes of the time set for the second SGM.
As can be seen from this article, there are quite a few substantial changes to the quorum requirements and voting procedures at an AGM or SGM under the STSMA and PMR’s. Should you have any queries or comments, please contact us on 021 686 3950 or at consulting@paddocks.co.za.
Article reference: Paddocks Press: Volume 12, Issue 02, Page 02.
Zerlinda van der Merwe is an admitted Attorney of the High Court, specialist Sectional Title Attorney (BA, LLB, LLM), Zerlinda brings a wealth of experience and forms part of the Paddocks Private Consulting Division.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
10 Comments.
Dear Paddocks.
I thoroughly enjoy reading your material on Sectional Title.
I am in a complex in Pretoria and the trustees have added significant charges on my account in the form of penalties and interest charged at 21%, but will not verify this with me.
They have openly told me that I cannot vote at the AGM and that even if I pay they will add more charges onto my account. The managing agent cannot help as they act under instriction from the Body Corporate. The current trustees know that if my 3 votes are counted, then new trustees will be in place. I have disputed this with the CSOS and have raised a legal case against them.
Is it true that my votes will not count? I see in your article it states
” A member is not entitled to vote on ordinary resolutions if they fail or refuse to pay the body corporate any amount due after a court or adjudicator has given a judgment or order for payment of that amount; or if they persist in the breach of any of the conduct rules of the body corporate after a court or an adjudicator has ordered that they refrain from breaching the conduct rules. This disqualification does not apply to special or unanimous resolutions.”
Does this mean I can vote as no court has ruled that I am in default as of this time.
Regards
Daniel
Dear Daniel,
Thank you for your comment. We are more than happy to help, however we do not give free opinions / advice. Please email us on consulting@paddocks.co.za with regards to your matter, and we can provide you with a no-obligation quote, so that we can assist you.
Kind regards,
Paddocks
Hi,
I wanted to know if the provision of the STA applies to HOA, more specifically s3(1)(b) relating to the Administrative Fund?
Dear Fazil,
Thank you for your comment. We are more than happy to help, however we do not give free opinions / advice. We do have a 10min consultation available for R390.00 if you are interested. Please email us on consulting@paddocks.co.za.
Kind regards,
Paddocks
Dear Paddocks
Thank you for your informative article. I have a question. If a person in a body corporate has been disqualified from voting for whatever reason, may they still present proxy votes from those who are entitled to vote but who cannot attend the meeting? I wondering on the legality of this and the law which governs it.
Thanks and regards
Elizabeth
Hi Elizabeth,
Thank you for your comment. We would love to help but unfortunately do not give free advice. Here’s how we can help:
– We offer a Free Basics of Sectional Title 1-week short course. You’ll be able to ask your course instructor any related questions. Find out more here.
– We offer consulting via telephone for R390 for 10 minutes. Please call us on +27 21 686 3950.
– We have Paddocks Club, an exclusive online club, to help you get answers to your questions about community schemes. Find out more here.
Kind regards
Paddocks
Good morning team,
I had a very difficult adjourned AGM on Saturday, owners contested the fact that the Chairman had proxies which were given to him for the original AGM, which didn’t proceed as result of no quorum.
Please will you confirm that the proxies appointed for the first AGM, are also valid for the adjourned meeting?
To me it makes sense, if not how will that members vote be brought into the picture?
Thanks and regards
Casper Daubert
Portfolio Manager
Hi Casper,
Thank you for your comment. We would love to help but unfortunately do not give free advice. Here’s how we can help:
– We offer a Free Basics of Sectional Title 1-week short course. You’ll be able to ask your course instructor any related questions. Find out more here.
– We offer consulting via telephone for R490 for 10 minutes. Please call us on +27 21 686 3950.
– We have Paddocks Club, an exclusive online club, to help you get answers to your questions about community schemes. Find out more here.
Kind regards
Paddocks
Good day, with regard to the above article, you did not mention the process and election of a chairperson for a quorum. Could you please specify.
Please can you elaborate on what is meant in your article by “calculated in number and PQ” with regards to voting? How do you determine a vote in two different manners? Must both the total PQ for and number of votes be in the majority? What if the PQ votes are for but the number votes are against or there is a tie?
Under which circumstances does a vote according to value apply and for which a vote by numbers?