There is a common misconception amongst sectional title owners that the trustees of the body corporate are more important than the ordinary members of the body corporate, with the chairperson being the most important of them all. This misconception stems from the fact that the trustees are seen to have the power to make certain decisions affecting the entire scheme without consulting or taking the views of the other members of the scheme into account.
“…trustees are entitled to enter short term rental agreements with owners to rent out part of the common property…”
The trustees are the executive body of the body corporate, appointed to make day-to-day decisions on behalf of all owners, and they do not have to call a meeting of owners every time a decision has to be taken. If they believe that it is necessary to raise a special levy to fund unbudgeted repairs to the common property they do not need to consult with the owners before raising the levy. Similarly, trustees are entitled to enter into short term rental agreements with owners to rent out a part of the common property for up to ten years. Trustees are also entitled to appoint employees, for example a gardener, caretaker or managing agent. The trustees may also initiate a process to obtain approval of non-luxurious improvements to the common property, such as the installation of security fences, but if any owner asks for a meeting to discuss the issues the trustees can only proceed if the meeting approves the proposals by special resolution.
But the Sectional Titles Act of 1986 provides for limitations on the discretion of the trustees and allows the owners to impose checks and balances to ensure that the trustees do not act outside the scope of their mandate, as provided for in the Act and implied by the budget approved at the last annual general meeting. Perhaps most importantly, the Act allows owners, by majority vote at any general meeting, to give directions to or place restrictions on the trustees, for example setting a maximum amount that the trustees may spend without consulting the other owners or directing them to act in a particular way in certain circumstances.
“…the Act allows owners, by majority vote at any general meeting, to give directions to or place restrictions on the trustees…”
Trustees should, whenever it is practical, consult with the members of the body corporate before making decisions which have a significant impact on their finances or use of the common property. At each annual general meeting the owners give the trustees financial instructions by approving a particular budget, if they feel it is necessary they can also draw up a list of issues giving the trustees specific directions or imposing particular restrictions on their actions. For as long as the trustees act within the scope of the provisions laid down in the Act and any additional restraints or directions which they decide, the members of the body corporate can rest assured that the management of the scheme is in capable hands.
here– cialisonlinefastrxbest– tadalafil generic– viagra without a prescription– generic viagra india
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
4 Comments.
What is rule of the Trustees making a discision of adding additional parking available in the complex
Hi Carl,
The trustees would need to follow the process set out in Prescribed Management Rule 33 of Annexure 8 of the Regulations to the Sectional Titles Act 95 of 1986, and it will need to to be determined, by the trustees, whether the proposed additional parking would be a luxurious or a non-luxurious improvement to common property.
Thanks,
Paddocks
Good day.
There are eight units in our complex. The managing agent colludes with the Chairman to extend their contact year-on-year. The managing agent is not objective. They react and attack complaints instead of resolve. There are unreasonable rules where if your levy payment is late, the fine is one and half times the value of the levy. They dictate how we should live, flout supply chain rules where friends/relations are given work to perform, and after their quotation for requested work is accepted and work has already commenced, then we are given a variance and revised higher quote to pay. Where do I go for assistance or whom can i contact?
Dear Sarika,
Thank you for your comment. Please email us on consulting@paddocks.co.za with regards to your matter, and we can provide you with a no-obligation quote, so that we can assist you.
Kind regards,
Paddocks