The prescribed management and conduct rules contained in Annexure 8 and 9 of the Regulations made under the Sectional Titles Act 95 of 1986 (“the Act”) need not apply in exactly the prescribed form to every new scheme.
A developer has some flexibility in determining the content of the rules. The Regulations provide two circumstances in which the prescribed rules can be substituted. In the first place the developer can substitute, add to, amend or withdraw certain of the prescribed management rules specified in Regulation 30(1) when submitting an application for the opening of a sectional title register.
Some of the rules that cannot be changed include the rules relating to the amendment of the rules; qualifications, election, remuneration, indemnity and removal from office of trustees; record of rules and their availability; improvements to common property; books of account and records; the audit; deposit and investment of funds; and appointment of the managing agent.
On opening the register, a developer can substitute other rules for any of the prescribed conduct rules. In terms of section 35(2) of the Act, the developer may not replace any prescribed conduct rule with a rule that conflicts with any prescribed management rule. In terms of section 35(1) of the Act, the management and conduct rules are subject to the provisions of the Act and may therefore not be inconsistent with any provision of the Act. Where the developer makes no alternative arrangements, then the prescribed rules will apply.
In the second place it is also possible for the developer to substitute any or all of the prescribed management rules (contained in Annexure 8 of the Regulations made under the Act) if certain conditions are met. In terms of section 11(2) of the Act a developer may impose registrable conditions when making application for the opening of a sectional title register and the registration of a sectional plan. This is done in the 11(3)(b) certificate which is certified by a conveyancer. The 11(3)(b) certificate sets out:
- the servitudes and conditions of title burdening or benefiting the land;
- other registrable conditions imposed by the developer; and
- other particulars as may be prescribed.
In terms of Regulation 30(2) the prescribed management rules will not apply to a scheme if the schedule referred to in section 11(3)(b) of the Act contains a condition restricting transfer of a unit without the consent of an association whose constitution stipulates that:
(a) all members of the body corporate of the development scheme of which the unit forms part must be members of that association, and
(b) the functions and powers of the body corporate must be assigned to that association.
It is important to note that Regulation 30(2)(a) requires that all the owners of the body corporate must be members of the association before the prescribed management rules can be substituted in their entirety. It is therefore not correct that the body corporate be made a member of the association.
Regulation 30(2)(b) requires that all the functions and powers of the body corporate must be assigned to the association. It is important to note that these rules will still be subject to the Act. Therefore the body corporate would still need to elect trustees in terms of section 39 of the Act. It is possible that the directors of the association fulfill the role of trustees, but they would still need to administer the scheme in conformity with the provisions of the Act.
Finally the substituted management rules would need to be reasonable, and apply equally to all owners of units put to substantially the same purpose in terms of section 35(3) of the Act.
This type of condition is used for schemes that require rules very different to those prescribed. For example it is used to regulate schemes that operate retirement villages, hotel operations, time-share and other holiday resorts. Such a title condition may also be used to provide a single management structure for one or more sectional title schemes in a larger complex that operate under the umbrella of a masters homeowners association.
Are you experiencing any problems in your scheme relating to developer-made rules or your scheme rules in general? Why not contact Paddocks to assist you in this regard?
Image source: househyderabad.com
Article reference: Paddocks Press: Volume 10, Issue 11, Page 1.
Carryn Melissa Durham is one of the most highly qualified Sectional Title lawyers in the country (BA. LLB, LLM and currently completing her Doctorate in the subject), Carryn forms part of the Paddocks Private Consulting Division.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
Recent Comments