One of the primary complaints received from owners in sectional title schemes around the country is, “My levies are too high, what can I do?”
In order to understand why levies can be considered “too high”, we first need to understand why levies, or contributions, are necessary in the first place.
Please note that for the purposes of this article, we will not be discussing:
– contributions due from owners who hold exclusive use rights;
– contributions due from developers who hold rights to extend the scheme; or
– special levies.
What are levies?
The Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act requires a body corporate to collect contributions (levies) from all members of the body corporate (in other words, all owners of sections in the scheme), in order to cover the common expenses and operating costs that the scheme will encounter during a given financial year.
These contributions are paid into two funds held and operated by the body corporate:
- The administrative fund, from which monies are drawn to cover the day-to-day maintenance and running costs of the scheme in terms of an approved budget; and
- The reserve fund, from which monies are drawn to cover the long-term repair and maintenance requirements of the scheme, in terms of the 10-year Maintenance, Repair and Replacement Plan.
Therefore, in simple terms, the levies cover all expenses that the body corporate encounters throughout a financial year. These expenses will vary from scheme to scheme, but will generally cover costs such as:
- General maintenance of the common property, such as roads, gardens and swimming pools.
- Cleaning of the common property.
- Security, including infrastructure, systems and personnel.
- Insurance premiums
- The management fee for the managing agent
- Payments for other services rendered to the body corporate (auditors, attorneys etc.)
- Rates, taxes and other municipal bills
- Banking and other similar administrative charges
- Major long-term maintenance projects (repainting, reroofing, repaving etc.)
How are levies or contributions calculated?
Once the trustees have determined the estimated costs involved with the running of the scheme over the period of the upcoming financial year, they can then set an admin and reserve fund budget accordingly. These budgets are then sent to all owners for approval at the body corporate’s Annual General Meeting. Once these budgets are approved by the owners (sometimes owners will request that the trustees amend the budgets before final approval is granted), the trustees can then calculate the contributions payable by each member of the body corporate.
Contributions are divided amongst owners according to the Participation Quota (PQ) of the section that they own, which is arrived at by dividing the floor area of their section by the floor area of all the sections in the scheme.
Put simply, if an owner has a section that measures 50 square metres, and the floor area of all the sections in the scheme together is 1000 square metres, the owners’ PQ will be 5.0000, or 5%. This owner will then be liable for contributions equal to 5% of the total budgeted expenses of the body corporate.
In most cases, the trustees resolve to collect the amount due in monthly instalments over the period of the financial year.
Tips to ensure levies are kept as low as possible
Now that we have explored a basic overview of the need for contributions and the way that these contributions are shared amongst owners, let us look at a few ways in which owners can ensure that levies remain as low as possible.
The best way to ensure that levies are kept as low as possible is to serve as a trustee and get involved in the annual budgeting processes for the scheme. It is important to know that it is the trustees, and not the managing agent, who have the final say in budgeted line items.
This is important because it means that even if a managing agent is urging a scheme to use “their” suggested service provider, for insurance, as an example, that the trustees may appoint an insurance company who are considerably cheaper. This applies to other services, such as auditors, security companies, garden services and contractors for maintenance work. Often, these contracts are signed for the period of a financial year, so alternative providers can be easily appointed.
A few changes in these types of expenses can save the body corporate thousands of Rands a month, and consequently, bring down the contributions due by each member of the body corporate.
Another way in which you can keep levy contributions as low as possible is to carefully study the budget and the Annual Financial Statements, presented by the trustees before the AGM, before simply approving them. Querying costs that you are unsure of, or that seem to be higher than necessary, will bring attention to these items and may cause the trustees to investigate and explain why the cost is high, or alert them to seek more cost-effective alternatives. This will ensure that the scheme’s finances are being managed carefully and will assist the trustees in adjusting costs for the next financial year.
It is important to note, however, that expenses that raise alarm bells do not mean that the trustees are attempting to defraud the body corporate – often, trustees are untrained in financial matters and will welcome the suggestion or assistance in these matters. Handling these interactions as an ally and not an accuser will go a long way in fostering cooperation in these matters.
Article reference: Paddocks Press: Volume 16, Issue 3.
Specialist Community Scheme Attorney (LLB, LLM), Auren Freitas dos Santos, is the Director of The Advisory, a boutique law firm specialising exclusively in community schemes law. Contact him at www.theadvisory.co.za.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
1 Comment.
Good article.
There are three problems with the way that levies are set/budgeted for.
1. Owners who create a budget to match the levy that they would like to pay
2. Budgets that are set at the AGM but don’t take into account that they need to be back dated to the beginning of the financial year and thus miss out on the increases for that period. (yes we know that they are supposed to go up at the start of the year)
3. Abbreviated budgets which are quite widespread. Those budgets based on three columns, what was budgeted for last year, what was spent last year , and what is budgeted for this year! What is needed is a detailed item by item, month by month budget. For example municipal charges go up on 1st July each year, insurance renewals go up in say November. To do a proper realistic budget is necessary to look at each item and carefully judge how much is to be paid and when.
Body Corporates that work out levies from proper thought through budgets will have far fewer problems.
Lastly, not increasing levies to try and be nice to people will only result in heavy increased in years to come.