Trustees need to be aware of the statutory functions of a body corporate in respect of the insurance:
to insure the building or buildings and keep it or them insured to the replacement value thereof against fire and such other risks as may be prescribed;
Rule 29 states that the trustees must see to it that the buildings and all improvements to the body corporate are insured to full replacement value against certain prescribed risks / perils. It also states that this must be arranged, subject to negotiation of premium, excess and rate which is in the best interest of all the owners.
It is my experience that this is an area often overlooked, everyone assuming that “its taken care of”. The buck always stops with the trustees so let’s take a closer look at what the new trustee can and should do straight away after being elected:
1. Find out when the buildings were last valued or how the present sums insured were determined.
2. Obtain a full copy of your present insurance policy, schedule of replacement values and claims history.
3. Do a rough “back of the cigarette box” estimation as follows:
Property description |
Sqm |
Rate Per sqm |
Amount |
Residential sections | 1,000 | 6,500 | R 6,500,000 |
Garage sections | 200 | 2,500 | 500,000 |
Sub Total | 7,000,000 | ||
Add 10% to 15% or so for common area | 700,000 | ||
Sub Total | 7,700,000 | ||
Add 12% for professional fees | 924,000 | ||
Add 14% VAT | 1,207,360 | ||
Add 5% for removal of debris | 491,568 | ||
Roughly estimated Replacement cost | R10,322,928 |
Use this format and perhaps do it using even 3 different rates and then compare it to your existing insurance sum insured.
4. If you seem to be underinsured, increase your cover up to at least your estimated amount and also set about arranging for a professional valuer to value your buildings – this should be done every 2 or 3 years.
5. Check your policy document – does the cover described match that as set out in prescribed management rules or your particular body corporate rules. Check the following :
a) premiums are paid up to date
b) the risk address stated matches the street address of the buildings
c) the policy is preferably a body corporate policy such as those issued by Corporate Sure, CIA, Abacus, Accomod8 or FPA (underwriting managers specialising in sectional title)
d) does the schedule of replacement costs as agreed to at your recent annual general meeting match that reflected in the policy
e) that there is sufficient public liability cover, minimum R10,000,000, preferably more, and preferably trustees indemnity extension
f) that there is preferably accidental damage cover and all risk cover for items that are at risk for theft such as air-conditioning units, aerials, cameras, etc.
6. Check on who your insurance advisor / broker is and ask for a copy of the last written advice and comparative quotations.
7. Check that you or your managing agent has a copy of your broker’s FAIS licence on file.
8. Check whether your insurance advisor has a good understanding and experienced in sectional title matters.
9. Check whether the insurance advisor and managing agent has professional indemnity cover
Another insurance aspect that should be considered – Fidelity Cover. Prescribed management rules suggest that the amount of cover, if any, should be determined by the owners. If the body corporate is managing its own accounts or self managed, then the body corporate needs to decide on how much cover it needs to protect itself against dishonesty / theft of body corporate monies by the trustees or employees.
If the body corporate is managed by a managing agent, then the body corporate’s money should be held in trust and thus covered by the Estate Agents Affairs Board Fidelity Guarantee. This issue has more recently been highlighted after the liquidation of a well known Cape based managing agent where it is alleged that large sums of money were misappropriated. Trustees need to make sure that they are receiving appropriate advice in this regard and re-visit how banking and signing power arrangements are covered.
Trustees should also check that professionals they deal with have appropriate professional indemnity cover. This will include your insurance broker, property valuer, auditor, attorney and your managing agent.
Trustees should also ensure that any contractor, attending to works on common property, have appropriate contractors all risk cover. Obtain confirmation of such before any works commence.
Once you have had the buildings re-valued, see to it that a fresh schedule of replacement values is prepared. Your managing agent should be able to assist you with this. Some specialist insurance advisors are geared to assist you here, but take care, it is not the insurance company’s place to prepare such a schedule – it’s between you and your managing agent to get this done properly and keep maintained and up to date.
It should NOT be a simple photocopy of the insurance company’s schedule but rather the insurance policy should be updated to reflect a mirror image of the body corporate’s schedule of replacement values.
Let each owner have a copy of this schedule and have it explained, presented and approved at the next general meeting.
It is always a good idea to send all owners and occupiers of units, insurance claims procedures and details of who to contact in case of an emergency e.g. hotline phone number for when a geyser/hot water cylinder bursts or an alternative number of plumbers recommended etc.
Trustees and owners can learn more about these and other important aspects by attending a workshop near you. See www.addsure.blogspot.com for more information on these. www.pima.co.za for more on indemnity cover for managing agents and www.sto.co.za for information and forum discussion on some of these issues.
Article reference: Volume 4, Issue 10, Page 2.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
2 Comments.
Dear Paddock Team
We require your expert advice on a unit in our complex who submitted an insurance claim which they were settled prior to job being carried out
It turned out when we as the body corporate asked for contractors certificate completion we the BC found out that the job was not done.
They filed a claim for the same issue once again and the insurance paid once again. They issue remains non repaired.
We also face an issue where the claim was for R 11500 and the insurance company sent their own assessor and in turn paid out an amount of R 28000
We now have an issue of supposed ” fraudulent claims ” by this unit who seems to be pocketing the money and hence we need guidance on how to proceed
Hi Rishaad,
Thanks so much for getting in touch with us. Could you kindly send an email to consulting@paddocks.co.za with the name of your scheme and a brief, but thorough, description of the issue?
They will then revert with a quote for their legal assistance.
Kind regards
Paddocks