In terms of property insurance, a retaining wall represents a higher risk to an Insurer and while cover is available, it must be issued separately. As in the case above, where retaining walls are not specifically insured, certain types of damage are not included in cover.
A Buildings Combined property insurance policy extends to include cover against a number of different perils. One such peril, and the one under which cover for retaining walls is not included, is the ‘storm, wind, water, hail, snow’ peril. In terms of the Buildings Combined policy wording, cover under this peril is automatically excluded. What this means is that if any damage to the retaining wall is caused by any one of these perils, the insurance policy will not indemnify the Insured for the loss. If cover is required, a specific written application must be made to the Underwriter.
So how are retaining walls different and how does the Insurance industry define retaining walls as opposed to other walls? There is a clear difference between a retaining wall and an ordinary wall, such as a boundary wall. Whilst a boundary wall serves as a dividing structure between two pieces of land, the purpose of a retaining wall is to split two sections of land that have different ground levels. Retaining walls are specifically designed to retain the upper level and prevent it from sliding or collapsing onto the lower level. Such a collapse of ground could result in damage to property on either of the levels.
All too often however, a wall is designed and erected as a boundary wall. Over time the soil levels on one side of the wall are raised due to landscaping or the surface pressures adjacent to the wall are altered due to further development. Now, what was once a boundary wall has been changed to a retaining wall, despite it not being designed or erected to serve this purpose. Property owners need to be aware of this and monitor such possibilities.
In light of this, it is quite apparent that a retaining wall needs to be constructed differently to an ordinary wall, to provide greater strength and support due to far greater pressures and influences on the wall. The insurance risks of retaining walls are thus very different to those of ordinary walls.
So, considering that a retaining wall may vary in height from one meter to several meters, an Insurer will require the submission of a stability report from a suitably qualified engineer prior to going on risk at inception or renewal of a policy, to substantiate the current stability of the structure. Once this report has been received and cover is approved, the Insurer will list the retaining wall separately on the policy schedule and in all likelihood charge an additional premium on the value of the retaining wall.
In conclusion, it is imperative that property owners be aware of all retaining walls on their property and monitor, on an ongoing basis, the changes to and around all retaining and boundary walls, especially where the other side of the wall is outside of their property. Pleading ignorance when your boundary wall becomes a retaining wall by the action or inaction of a third party and then collapses is of no help in an insurance claim. When in doubt, always ask your Broker or Insurance Underwriter for assistance. Be safe, not sorry.
Article reference: Paddocks Press: Volume 7, Issue 7, Page 2
Bruce Gibson is an Advisor at AddSure Insurance Brokers (www.addsure.co.za).
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
3 Comments.
I had a boundary wall in my premises. One part collapsed and a month thereafter another part after a period of 10years Insurers said no cover it’s retaining wall. It should be separately insured. How do I overcome this problem
Good day Farad,
Thank you for your comment. We would love to help but unfortunately do not give free advice. Please see below for how we can help:
– We offer consulting via telephone for R390 for 10 minutes. Please call 0216863950.
– We have Paddocks Club, an exclusive online club, headed by Prof Graham Paddock, to help you get answers to your questions about community schemes: http://club.paddocks.co.za/
– We offer a Free Basics of Sectional Title short course starting soon: http://www.paddocks.co.za/courses/free-basics-of-sectional-title/
Kind regards,
Paddocks
I was really disturbed when the retaining wall of our property was collapsed. It was very bitter with that incident. Thanks for sharing the same as it happened with us.