It is unfortunate that the requests for assistance with removing a board of trustees’ chairperson from office seem to be flooding our inboxes here at Paddocks lately. While the sceptics among us may jump to the conclusion that these requests stem from an increasing number of chairpersons across the country breaching their fiduciary duties toward their bodies corporate, I like to remain optimistic and draw the conclusion that this is merely the result of an increase in knowledge among sectional title owners and their resultant refusal to be accepting of a chairperson that has become complacent in their role. Whatever the motivation behind this may be, it is important that owners be made aware that they have the power to remove a chairperson from office and that there is therefore no reason to sit back and accept the status quo if it goes against the owners’ wishes.
The trustees are the ones who elected the chairperson, does this mean they have to be the ones to remove him or her from office?
Prescribed Management Rules (“PMR”) 12(5) and 12(6) contained in Annexure 1 of the Regulations to the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act, 2011 read as follows:
12(5): “The trustees at a trustees meeting or the members at a general meeting may remove the chairperson from office if notice of the meeting contains a clear statement of the proposed removal; provided that such removal does not automatically remove the chairperson from the office of trustee.” and
12(6): “If a chairperson is removed from office as such or ceases to hold office as a trustee, the remaining trustees must elect a replacement chairperson from among their number who holds office as chairperson for the remainder of the period of office of his or her predecessor and has the same voting rights.”
These prescribed rules clarify that, although the trustees who elected the chairperson have the power to remove him or her from office at a trustees meeting, the owners also have the power to do so. However, owners need to remain mindful of the following key facts contained in the rules above:
- The members can only remove the chairperson from office at a general meeting (either the annual general meeting or a special general meeting);
- Removal of the chairperson from office requires no more than the passing of an ordinary resolution by the members;
- The members can only remove the chairperson from office if the passing of such resolution was clearly indicated as an agenda item on the notice calling the meeting;
- This removal of the chairperson from office does not constitute a removal of the person as trustee serving in such capacity on the board; and
- The members do not have the power to elect a replacement chairperson – this power lies with the trustees.
It is clear from these facts that the removal of the chairperson needs proper planning and that it cannot simply be suggested and actioned at a meeting of members without the proper notice first having been given. In addition, it is important that members decide and clarify whether they want to remove the chairperson from office in his or her capacity as the chairperson or whether they wish to remove him or her from the board of trustees altogether. Should their intention be the latter, they have to abide by PMR 6(4)(g), which reads as follows:
“A trustee ceases to hold office if that trustee is removed from office by ordinary resolution of a general meeting; provided the intention to vote on the proposed removal was specified in the notice convening the meeting”
Therefore, it is of the utmost importance that the notice calling the meeting clearly states whether the members wish to remove the chairperson from office as chairperson or whether they wish to remove him or her from office as trustee (which will automatically remove him or her from the office as chairperson by implication). The requirement for both is the passing of an ordinary resolution at a general meeting.
Calling the general meeting
As the chairperson can only be removed from office at a general meeting, the members wishing to remove him or her need to be mindful of the following requirements pertaining to such meeting as contained in PMR 17(4) and 17(5):
- The trustees may, by resolution, call a general meeting whenever they believe a meeting is necessary;
- The trustees must call a general meeting if 25% of the members in value or the mortgage bond holder of 25% of the value of the sections request a meeting;
- This request must be in writing, signed by 25% of members or the bond holder and then be delivered to the body corporate;
- The request must include the motion(s) or matter(s) the members or bondholder wishes to pass or discuss at the meeting;
- If the trustees do not call the requested meeting within 14 days of delivery of the request, the members or bondholder can call the meeting; and
- The motion(s) or matter(s) as set out in the meeting request, must be included in the agenda for the meeting.
If owners wish to have a special general meeting called to remove the chairperson from office, they therefore need to take the following practical steps:
-
1. Draw up (or have drawn up) a request to the trustees to call a special general meeting for the purpose of passing an ordinary resolution by members to have the chairperson removed from office as chairperson or trustee.
2. Circulate the drawn up request to the members and get 25% of them (based on their participation quotas) to sign the detailed request.
3. Once 25% of members have signed the request, deliver the request to the trustees.
Should the trustees fail and/or refuse to call the meeting within 14 days of your delivery of the request and you require assistance with the further steps in the process set out above, don’t hesitate to contact the writer at consulting@paddocks.co.za for a no obligation quote to provide the necessary legal assistance.
Article reference: Paddocks Press: Volume 13, Issue 10.
Specialist Community Scheme Attorney (BA (Law) LLB), Ané de Klerk, combines her work experience as a Portfolio Manager with knowledge of conveyancing and community scheme law.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
5 Comments.
Our Chairman recused himself Rule 6(3) from being involved in the fitting of unapproved security bars on the balcony of a good friend of his after complaints were lodged by members. He quoted conflict of interest.
Was it envisaged that this rule could override his fiduciary duty to uphold the Sectional Title Act in regard to correct procedures, harmonious appearance, etc?
Thanking you.
Hi Dave,
Thank you for your comment. We would love to help, however we do not give free advice. Here’s how we can help:
– We offer consulting via telephone for R490 for 10 minutes. Please call us on 021 686 3950.
– We have Paddocks Club, an exclusive online club, to help you get answers to your questions about community schemes.
Kind regards,
Paddocks
Good day, what happens in a situation where the ex Board/ex Chair continue to manipulate current Chairs actions to the detriment of the overall community? How can this be overcome ?
Hi Ms Sayed,
Thank you for your comment. We would love to help, however we do not give free advice. Here’s how we can help:
– We offer a 1-week Free Basics of Sectional Title short course.
– We offer consulting via telephone for R490 for 10 minutes. Please call us on 021 686 3950.
– We have Paddocks Club, an exclusive online club, to help you get answers to your questions about community schemes.
Kind regards,
Paddocks
Good day
We are a group of 5 trustees with 2 co opt spouses, at the recent AGM a member of the BC nominated oneself to be trustee, thereafter elected herself as the chairperson. This trustee/ chairperson has an extremely dominating character & is an absolute dictator whom is now obsessed with being the chiarperson. We want to have the person step down as chairperson, however kindly advise me on the simplest yet most diplomatic manner in which to have this done?