By Jennifer Paddock
Reconfiguration of a unit
Now the trustees have demanded that I revert it back to the original configuration. My question is: isn’t this a purely an internal reconfiguration that I am entitled to do? Can the body corporate make such a demand? No structural changes were done. The new kitchen has very superior finishes and adds to the overall décor of the lounge.
The rules of the sectional scheme have no rules prohibiting internal reconfigurations. The rules have very clearly set limits on the number of residents allowed for each unit. Their explanation is that if all owners convert their units accordingly – there will be a problem with overcrowding.
My argument is that overcrowding occurs when people cram more people into their sections, and has nothing to do with the internal layout in any case. Please advise me. Am I obliged to reverse the changes?
A1: As the owner of a unit in the scheme you own your section exclusively and are entitled to do internal alterations to it. However, as a co-owner of the common property and a member of the body corporate you also have a responsibility to ensure that any internal alterations done to your section do not compromise the harmonious appearance of the building, your duty of subjacent and lateral support to the sections below and next to yours and that these alterations do not result in the body corporate’s insurance policy being compromised. Of course your building plans must also have been approved by the municipality.
From your question it sounds as if you have complied with your responsibilities towards your co-owners and the body corporate in respect of your alterations. If this assumption is correct, you are not obliged to reverse the internal changes you have made to your section. The trustees and managing agent cannot successfully demand that you reverse the changes because your new internal configuration may potentially lead to overcrowding of your section. Provided your section is not overcrowded, you are complying with the rules and cannot be punished “just in case” you breach them in the future.
Developer to Chairman
Q2: May a trustee (developer) nominate himself at the first Trustees meeting as Chairman?
A2: Before a scheme’s inaugural (first) general meeting all the owners in the scheme are automatically trustees and the developer of the scheme is the chairperson of the trustees until the end of the inaugural meeting.
The inaugural meeting is chaired by the developer as chairperson of the trustees and at this meeting new trustees are elected. If the chairperson is elected as a trustee at the inaugural meeting then s/he would be entitled to nominate him/herself as the chairperson of the trustees for the ensuing year at the first meeting of the trustees after the inaugural meeting and s/he would be eligible for re-election to the office of chairperson. However, if the developer was not elected as a trustee at the inaugural meeting then s/he would not be able to nominate him/herself for the position of chairperson as the chairperson has to be a trustee.
Paying the excess
Q3: In a sectional title complex, who is responsible for the excess payment to the Insurance Company for the replacement of a geyser? My geyser was replaced without me being informed. I only received an sms message to say I must pay an excess amount of R1600-00. Shouldn’t the body corporate make provision in its reserve funds for maintenance and repairs of geysers in the monthly levy amount? What are my rights as a sectional owner in this case? Your timeous response would be highly appreciated before things fuse up.
A3: In terms of prescribed management rule (PMR) 68(1)(vii) it is an owner’s responsibility to repair and maintain the geyser that serves his/her section. Additionally, in terms of PMR 29(4) the owner of a section is responsible for any excess payment in respect of his/her section payable in terms of a contract of insurance entered into by the body corporate. Therefore you, as the owner of the section that is served by the geyser and as the owner of the section in terms of which the insurance excess is payable, are responsible to pay the excess of R1600-00.
Window cleaning
Q4: In a sectional title complex or block of flats, is the body corporate responsible for cleaning the outside windows?
A4: The body corporate is responsible to repair and maintain the common property in terms of section 37(1)(j) of the Act. Maintenance of the common property includes the cleaning of all common property windows.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
2 Comments.
Hi
Can an Insurance consultant representing his company, that the body corporate complex is insured with, can he become a trustee or is this a conflict of interest?
Hi Bunny,
Thank you for your comment. This would be something that our legal team would need to assist with. Kindly send a detailed brief to consulting@paddocks.co.za and the team will revert with a no-obligation quote for their assistance with your matter.
Kind regards
Paddocks Team