By the Paddocks Club team
Below are examples of two questions on the Paddocks Club discussion forum, to show you what is available to our Community members!
Adult son of tenant visiting, sleeping in vehicle on common property: What to do?
Member’s question:
Good day Paddock Team,
What is the right of the body corporate when a tenants have an adult son that is not on the lease agreement, this particular son is parking his vehicle on common property outside as well as inside the complex, he is homeless and sleeps inside the vehicle.
Furthermore he enters the complex when his father is not home. The other residents feels that he could possibly be a risk as he is unemployed and associated with drugs.
Can the body corporate prevent the tenant son from parking on common property, and can assess to the complex be denied to the son.
Your guidance in this matter will be appreciated.
Graham’s answer:
Dear member,
A general feeling that the son is associated with drugs or a prejudice against him because he is unemployed is not sufficient for the body corporate to attempt to control this behaviour.
A tenant normally has the right to allow his family, such as this son, to visit the rented flat and visitors are allowed to use the common property, within reason, so the son’s being on the common property is not, in itself, a breach of either the lease or the scheme’s rules. A tenant’s visitor is entitled to park in the scheme’s visitor’s parking, so again, there is no obvious breach.
However, the use of the common property by a tenant or tenant’s visitor must be reasonable, so I think other owners and the body corporate have a right to object to anyone who regularly sleeps in a car on the common property. I suggest you get photographic and witness evidence that this happens regularly and then launch a CSOS application for an order against the parents and son to the effect that this constitutes a nuisance and they, and their visitors, are not to sleep/live in a car on the common property or otherwise abuse the visitors’ parking bays.
What the son does outside the boundary of the scheme is not something the body corporate can control.
Graham.
Can a body corporate contribute to security measures outside of the scheme boundaries?
Member’s question:
Hi Graham
I have a scheme that would like to contribute to a security initiative outside of the scheme boundaries. The security initiative is driven by a 3rd party to increase patrols and security technology (cameras etc) within the neighbourhood.
They have approached all the schemes in the area to contribute towards their operational costs. Certain members within the scheme are opposed to these additional costs. The trustees would like to participate in this initiative and need to know what resolution would need to be passed.
Can this be passed by inclusion into the Conduct Rules (Special Resolution), or would one need to pass a unanimous resolution. My opinion would be having to pass a unanimous resolution as this falls outside of the schemes boundaries (ie Public spaces).
Am I correct in my thinking?
Regards.
Graham’s answer:
Dear member,
I don’t think the owners need to make a special conduct rule.
As long as the trustees are convinced that the body corporate’s participation in this security initiative will have the effect of increasing security within the boundaries of the scheme itself, the decision to join can be authorised by a trustee resolution under Prescribed Management Rule 21(f).
However, the amount of the body corporate’s contribution will also have to be covered by a budget item approved by owners, as required under Prescribed Management Rule 9(c), before the trustees are entitled to authorise payment of the subscription.
In the circumstances I suggest that the body corporate’s agreement to participate should only be for a year at a time and that the expense should be shown as a separate line item in its administrative fund budget.
Graham.
Article reference: Paddocks Press: Volume 14, Issue 10.
Graham Paddock is available to answer questions on the Paddocks Club discussion forum for Community members. Get all your questions answered by joining Paddocks Club.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
Recent Comments