By the Paddocks Club team
Below are examples of two questions on the Paddocks Club discussion forum, to show you what is available to our Community members!
Can a special levy /contribution be payable over 12 months?
Member’s question:
Good afternoon
Can you please let me know what the maximum period a special levy can be implemented for.
We have a body corporate that wants to do a special levy over 12 months – Are they allowed to do that?
Thanks
Graham’s answer:
Dear member,
A special contribution / levy can only be raised for an amount that needs to be urgently collected, i.e. cannot wait until the next annual general meeting (AGM) to fund it via the admin fund levy. So the period of the special levy should never extend over 12 months, as whatever is required in the next accounting period should not be included, but budgeted for ordinarily.
Trustees sometimes see a “special levy” as being a levy to fund a particular/special expense. This is wrong.
Graham.
Can a developer’s last unit be removed from the scheme?
Member’s question:
Good day Paddocks Team,
We have recently been appointed as the M/A for a sectional title of 21 units.
This sectional title were previously an investment of one owner that decided to sell the units and to register this investment as a sectional title.
After the first general meeting the owner/developer decided that unit 21 must not form part of the sectional title after the budget and participation quota (PQ) have been approved by owners.
What will the steps be to remove this unit from the sectional title? If possible at all?
I will appreciate it if you can assist me in this matter?
Graham’s answer:
Dear member,
It is not unusual for a developer to want to wash his hands of the body corporate, but it is very complex and expensive to remove a unit from a scheme. In practice it is usually impossible.
I suggest that you should tell the developer, who wants to remove unit 21, that his first step should be to talk to the local municipality to see if this is even possible. If it is, then he should go to his attorney to get advice on how it could be done. The technical steps include:
1. Municipal permission for subdivision of the common property to create a new erf around what is now section 21.
2. Body corporate by unanimous resolution alienates the property to be transferred.
3. Section 21 is “destroyed” from a legal perspective, with bondholders’ consent.
4. Body corporate transfers the common property, around where section 21 was, to the developer.
The process requires a number of new sectional plans, unanimous resolutions and substantial legal costs.
In the meantime, you have to manage the scheme on the basis that the developer is an owner, he must pay levies and is bound by the body corporate’s rules.
Graham.
Article reference: Paddocks Press: Volume 14, Issue 05.
Graham Paddock and Ané de Klerk are available to answer questions on the Paddocks Club discussion forum for Community members. Get all your questions answered by joining Paddocks Club.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
2 Comments.
Hi guys, I live in a sectional title complex and the trustees want to call a special levy fir the painting of the upper block and only the upper block was asked topay a special levy. However a few years ago the bottom block was painted and no special levy was required. It my knowledge I thnk soeciallevy should be paid by everyone not only the top block, also painting is not a emergency, to require a special levy . Please assist
Hi Nicole,
Thank you for engaging.
That’s a great question. This is something our attorneys would be able to assist with. Please email us on consulting@paddocks.co.za with regards to your matter, and we can provide you with a no-obligation quote, so that we can assist you.
Kind regards,
Paddocks