By the Paddocks Club team
Below are examples of two questions on the Paddocks Club discussion forum, to show you what is available to our Community members!
Must managing agents have a fidelity fund certificate and what experience is required to manage a portfolio?
Member’s question:
Hi Graham,
1) Are there any exceptions to a Managing Agent being required to hold an fidelity fund certificate?
2) Are portfolio managers required to have a certain amount of experience in managing sectional schemes prior to being able to independently manage a portfolio?
Thanks!
Graham’s answer:
Dear member,
2. Your second question is easier.
No, there is no legal requirement for particular training or experience before a person takes independent control of the management of schemes in a managing agency. Such requirement / standards would make sense, but the managing agency industry is not regulated by legislation yet, except for the “receiving or collecting” of levies as discussed below, which is an incidental “estate agency service” regulated under the Estate Agency Affairs Act. The Estate Agency Affairs Act itself does not deal with managing agency at all, only the sale and letting of property.
The principal owner of an estate/managing agency must hold a fidelity fund certificate if the agency “receives or collects” levies from sectional title or share block schemes.
1. There is an argument as to what the phrase “receives or collects” means. There are people who offer scheme management services and ensure that their client schemes’ money always goes into accounts in the schemes’ names, never into their own accounts. Their argument, which makes sense to me, is that these people are not estate agents because they are not performing an “estate agency service” as defined in the Estate Agency Affairs Act regulations. While they may send out invoices and reminders, they never take possession of any scheme money, therefore they are not legally required to have a fidelity fund certificate and there is no need for that “insurance”.
The Estate Agency Affairs Board argues that the phrase “receives or collects” includes sending out invoices and reminders. They have from time to time taken action against the type of operators described above who are not registered as estate agents.
Paddocks advice to people who want to start their own managing agencies, i.e. want to be “owners / principals” in such a business is: If you don’t ever touch scheme money, the law does not require you to be an estate agent or have a fidelity fund certificate, but you should do the exams (as exasperating as it may be to learn about letting and selling when what you want to do is manage), qualify as an estate agent and get a fidelity fund certificate because if your agency grows to any appreciable size you will want to offer schemes the ability to collect their money in your account. And at the moment, to offer that service one of the owners/principals needs to be an estate agent and hold a fidelity fund certificate.
There are obvious absurdities, and the law should be changed so that managing agency is properly regulated and all those who work in it are held to reasonable standards of performance and fidelity. The Property Practitioners Bill has been passed and it may do what is required. The statute covers managing agents, but we have yet to see the regulations that will apply under it. The Act itself makes no special provisions for managing agents, but hopefully the regulations will set minimum standards, perhaps in a code of conduct that deals properly with client money and fiduciary duties.
Graham.
Can the body corporate force me to remove this palm tree?
Member’s question:
Hi team,
We have been ask or rather ordered to remove a palm tree that is situated in the exclusive use area of our unit. As mentioned in previous discussion regarding question around exclusive use area emergency/service exits. Another palm tree in front of the unit was removed a while ago, which was damaging the driveway of the complex. That is understandable.
Just after that we was informed by the body corporate that the palm tree in our exclusive use area was to be removed because the Tree Removal Contractor has informed the chairman that insurance will not pay out for any damages cause by that tree if it was struck by lightning. We did contact the complex insurance company regarding this. Their comments was that it is not part of their regulations or requirements that the trees must be removed. The tree must be maintained and trimmed.
It is then when it transpired that the owner next door was complaining about the palm tree. He has a big thatch lapa that is attached to his unit and was concerned about the tree get struck by lightning and causing damage to his lapa. The insurance company was never informed about this thatched structure and duly did asked the owner to oblige to the requirements regarding thatched structure.(fire extinguishers,etc)
We ignored the request to remove the tree but was later instructed in writing by the body corporate to remove the tree within 30 days on our own cost.
Question is…
Are we obliged to do this?
If so, must it be on our own cost?
If not obliged to do, cant we just maintain the tree and cut off the dry leaves or is it the body corporate’s responsibility?
Problem is that the only way to get access to this tree is through our front door, living area and kitchen. Can you imagine all the equipment, ladders, rubble and palm tree remains going through your living area?
Many thanks!
Graham’s answer:
Dear member,
The principle is straightforward. You can’t use your property to cause a nuisance to another.
In this forum we only give general advice, so here it is: If you want to resist the demand to remove the tree, you should focus on arguing that it is not in fact a nuisance to the next door owner or anyone else. In the context of this particular scheme, your having the tree is a normal use of an exclusive use area. At the same time it may well make sense to trim the tree.
As to costs, the body corporate is obliged to recover from you any amount it spends on the tree – please read section 3(1)(c).
I suggest that you spend a few minutes reading chapters 6-11 of the ST Survival Manual, which you can find under the heading Books above. It will give you answers to many of your questions.
Graham.
Article reference: Paddocks Press: Volume 14, Issue 02.
Graham Paddock and Ané de Klerk are available to answer questions on the Paddocks Club discussion forum for Community members. Get all your questions answered by joining Paddocks Club.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
4 Comments.
2019 -after the new STSMA ruling in October 2016 – and with managing agent having access to BC accounts – is it still a requirement for the managing agent to have an updated Fidelity certificate registered with EAAB
susan, may not be the right place to ask but docs re “2019 -after the new STSMA ruling in October 2016 – and with managing agent having access to BC accounts – is it still a requirement for the managing agent to have an updated Fidelity certificate registered with EAAB”
Will our insurance pay for any common property damage if our managing agent is not registered with the EAAB OR NAMA?
Hi Pamela,
Thank you for engaging.
That’s a great question. This is something our attorneys would be able to assist with. Please email us on consulting@paddocks.co.za with regards to your matter, and we can provide you with a no-obligation quote, so that we can assist you.
Kind regards,
Paddocks