By the Paddocks Club team
Below are examples of two questions on the Paddocks Club discussion forum, to show you what is available to our Community members!
Trustee in arrears and still defaults on repayments
Member’s question:
Good day,
There is a trustee who is in arrears with his levies and was handed over to the lawyers for the collection of the outstanding levies. He makes one payment and then continues to default on his arrears. This person is insisting he will remain as a trustee and we feel the situation is detrimental to the body corporate. Is he still permitted to remain as a trustee given he has to vote on certain issues at meetings and might be in conflict with certain agendas regarding levy collections whilst being in arrears himself?
Anton’s answer:
Good day,
A person ceases to be a trustee if he or she does not pay arrears in spite of a court or adjudicator’s order. The position is not reversed once they pay, as set out in prescribed management rule 6(4)(f).
Section 3(2) says the body corporate may recover arrears by applying to the Community Schemes Ombud Service for an order so that is what the trustees should do, having notified that person as required in prescribed management rule 25(2).
A trustee may not vote in a trustee resolution, or even attend the part of a meeting at which that matter is discussed if he or she has a personal interest in the matter, according to prescribed management rule 6(3) and prescribed management rule 14(3)(b).
Hope this helps to clear things up!
Overdue levies in a Sectional Title
Member’s question:
Good day,
We have just had our annual general meeting and have made a few amendments to our conduct rules. One of them is in the levies section where it states the following:
“Levies are due in advance on the first of each month and are payable within 5 days after which interest, at a rate determined by the trustees, will be payable on overdue accounts.”
We want to change that to put in a percentage of what we can charge per month.
Can you let me know what the minimum and maximum are, that we can charge per month?
Anton’s answer:
Good day,
There is no need for this rule as the prescribed rules deal with the issue.
Prescribed management rule 21(3)(c) allows the trustees to charge interest on arrears and provides for the maximum rate. The maximum rate regulated by the National Credit Act for incidental credit (which is the accepted rate) is 24% per annum, which is 2% per month. This is also the rate charged by the Community Schemes Ombud Service for arrears on its levy.
Prescribed management rule 25(1) says the trustees must notify the members in writing of their liability to pay the contribution, what it is and the interest that applies.
Article reference: Paddocks Press: Volume 13, Issue 6.
Professor Graham Paddock, Anton Kelly, Zerlinda van der Merwe and Ané de Klerk are available to answer questions on the Paddocks Club discussion forum for Community members. Get all your questions answered by joining Paddocks Club.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
8 Comments.
Good day
Good day
I have lodged a dispute against our Chairperson, with CSOS. The said Chairperson was illegitimately elected as a Trustee whilst having outstanding debt to the HOA. This contravenes clauses 8.8 and 26.2 of our Constitution. Also the then Chairperson warned all Owners, in writing, not to attend the AGM if they had “any sum of money” outstanding.
This Chairperson continued to be in debt whilst a Trustee for 2 more months.
Unfortunately CSOS due to poor administration have let 2 months go by without holding the Concilliatory meeting. I have to leave for work (Offshore for 3 months) and warned CSOS of this on 1st June 2018. No reaction by CSOS. The Conciliator just granted the “Exco” a further 2 days extension for their submission due to CSOS misprinting the year (2017) of due date for their submission. I objected in writing to the Conciliator but received no reply.
The “Exco” have issued a veiled threat of costs which they will no doubt try and recoup from me? It seems I will not be present for the Conciliation process and the SGM the Trustees have suddenly called to “discuss” my dispute.
I objected to all of the above but received no reply to date.
Please advise on the costs the Trustees might be able to claim and also on the fairness of the procedures by the CSOS.
Many Thanks.
Regards
Wolfgang Redeker
Hi Wolfgang,
We can answer your question in a consult with one of our attorneys. Alternatively, we have an online Club where you can have your questions answered within 24 hours. You also have access to all the latest legislation as well as a navigator function to find topics easily, hundreds of video tutorials on various sectional title and HOA subjects and much more.
There are various membership options including a ‘Quick access’ 7-day membership. Learn more, here: https://club.paddocks.co.za/
If you have any questions, or to book a consult, please call on 0216863950 and we’ll be happy to help.
Kind regards,
Paddocks
“Under section 5 of the Sectional Titles Act 95 of 1986, the median line is defined as the dividing line between a floor/wall/ceiling/window/door. It is common practice if a wooden door/window needs to be replaced due to long term maintenance, that the owner pays half, and the Body Corporate pays the other half – this if neither party has been negligent in terms of their maintenance duties over time.
Is there any case law to this effect? And is this truly a generally accepted practice? What is the replacement is aluminium and not wood, would (or should) the Body Corporate pay half? This under the thinking that the maintenance of aluminium will be a lot less than wood. Aluminium however being more expensive. “
Hi Arthur,
Thank you for your comment. We would love to help but unfortunately do not give free advice. Here’s how we can help:
– We offer a Free Basics of Sectional Title 1-week short course. You’ll be able to ask your course instructor any related questions. Find out more here.
– We offer consulting via telephone for R490 for 10 minutes. Please call us on +27 21 686 3950.
– We have Paddocks Club, an exclusive online club, to help you get answers to your questions about community schemes. Find out more here.
Kind regards
Paddocks
I don’t know if you received my last message. I would just like to know if 4 trees can be removed from the common property area (which were planted there so that 3 townhouses did not look onto the unsightly view of the houses in front with wash lines, garden sheds etc. Do the trustees have to have a vote from all 60 owners prior to something as large as this being removed. It was done with no knowledge given to any of us.
These trees must have cost an absolute fortune to be cut and removed – I was at work when this happened with no prior knowledge.
All I am asking now, is that a few large pots be put against the walls of the front houses with bougainvillea or something hardy, so that they can grow and eventually cover the ugly site of the front. They say they do not have the funds, but the rest of the gardens are continually having new plants; ie. annuals and perenials, planted but a few pots can’t be bought to cover this ugly site.
I am quite sure that all 60 owners of our townhouses were supposed to vote under the sectional titles act, prior to these trees being removed.
Our address is Mill Hill Townhouses, Cor Norman and Main Rds, Bryanston, Sandton, South Africa
Your help would be truly appreciated.
Hi Carol,
Thank you for your comment. We would love to help, however we do not give free advice. Here’s how we can help:
– We offer a 1-week Free Basics of Sectional Title short course.
– We offer consulting via telephone for R490 for 10 minutes. Please call us on 021 686 3950.
– We have Paddocks Club, an exclusive online club, to help you get answers to your questions about community schemes.
Kind regards,
Paddocks
Good day. When the Body Corporate decides to acquire land adjacent to the existing property is it only the trustees who decide anonymously in writing to acquire the land or do the owners themselves also have a say in the purchasing decision?
Hi Leon,
Thank you for your comment. We would love to help, however we do not give free advice. Here’s how we can help:
– We offer consulting via telephone for R490 for 10 minutes. Please call us on 021 686 3950.
– We have Paddocks Club, an exclusive online club, to help you get answers to your questions about community schemes.
Kind regards,
Paddocks