By the Paddocks Club team
Below are examples of two questions on the Paddocks Club discussion forum. We want to show you what is available to our Community members!
Special general meetings
Member’s question:
Good Day
Can a special general meeting be held with less than 30 days notice if all owners are in agreement.
Anton’s answer:
Hello
If you mean shorter than 30 days notice of a meeting at which a special or unanimous resolution is to be considered, then yes, prescribed management rules 15(7)(a) applies.
If the matter is urgent, is not a special resolution to approve an improvement to the common property that is reasonably necessary or to approve the installation of pre-paid meters, the trustees can call the meeting with as little as 7 days notice.
Exclusive use levies
Member’s question:
Dear Paddocks team
A complex does not have a separate levy for their exclusive use area. All the units are the same and they only have one levy.
They have a gardener that attends to the common property and the exclusive use area. One of the owners have now sent a letter to the trustees requesting that her levy be reduced as she is not happy with the gardener and does not want him in her exclusive use area.
How should handle this, as all the other owners seem to be happy with the gardener.
Zerlinda’s answer:
Hello
In terms of section 3(1)(c) of the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act, the body corporate (trustees) must require the owners of sections entitled to the right to the exclusive use of a part/s of common property (registered or rule based) to make an additional contribution to the administrative and reserve funds of the body corporate.
The body corporate, in terms of section 3(1)(l) of the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act, is responsible to maintain and repair the exclusive use areas, but the owner, in terms of section 13(1)(c) of the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act, must keep the exclusive use area in a clean and neat condition.
An owner cannot be excluded from contributing towards a body corporate expenses, unless the process as set out in section 11(2) of the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act is followed.
In your situation, the owner must keep her exclusive use area clean and neat, but she must still contribute towards the expenses associated with the exclusive use area, in the form of an additional contribution
Article reference: Paddocks Press: Volume 12, Issue 11, Page 04.
Professor Graham Paddock, Anton Kelly, Dr Carryn Melissa Durham and Zerlinda van der Merwe are available to answer questions on the Paddocks Club discussion forum for Community members. Get all your questions answered by joining Paddocks Club.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
3 Comments.
The last paragraph of Zerlinda’s article on Levies on Exclusive Use Area’s does not make sense.
” the owner must keep her Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act clean and neat,”
It should read – “keep her exclusive use area clean and neat,”
Hi David,
Thank you for bringing it to our attention. We have updated the answer to that question, to match the correct answer as per the Paddocks Club post. Please see above.
Thank you,
Paddocks
I live on the ground floor of an apartment comprising 5 units – two on the first floor and two on the second floor. The L-shaped garden surrounding my apartment is completely sealed off, each of the two bedrooms opening out onto a a different “leg” of the surrounding garden. The garden area is 4m x 5m on one side and 3,5m x 6 m on the other. One leg is registered as exclusive use; the other as common property. It is not common in nature in any way at all and has been respected as such for 25 years. Now a tenant on the top floor wants to use this area, which invades privacy in the bedroom (1m from the door) and the dining room (1m away). Can I argue for invasion of privacy and request all to be exclusive – and paid for. I have maintained and improved the entire area for 6 years now.