By The Paddocks Club Team
Below are examples of two questions on the Paddocks Club discussion forum. We want to show you what is available to our Community members!
Non-executive trustees
Member’s question:
The previous chairman of a complex no longer lives in the complex, but wants to be an executive trustee. Does he have the same voting power as the other trustees?
When the other trustees, who live in the complex make a decision, he often overrides their decision.
Please advise
Anton’s answer:
I am assuming this person was elected as a trustee at the last Annual General Meeting and subsequently elected chairperson by the new board.
He remains a trustee and chairperson even though he does not live in the scheme and even though he might have sold his unit.
The chairperson cannot over ride a duly taken trustee resolution. All trustee decisions must be taken by formal trustee resolution, either at a meeting or by round robin. Reversing the decision would require another trustee resolution.
Voting, holding proxies, and disqualification as trustee if in arrears
Member’s question:
One individual who owns 10 units, is a Trustee, and is up-to-date with levy payments for 8 of those units, but is in arrears with levies on the remaining 2 units, which has been the case for quite some time. The owner is trying to bring the arrear amount down, and in terms of prescribed management rule 13(e) is disqualified from being a trustee. The question has been raised that owing to the fact that this owner is up-to-date with 8 of the 10 Units, does the disqualification to be a Trustee still apply?
Prescribed management rule 64 also disallows this owner from voting, but again the question being asked is should the owner not be permitted to vote for the 8 Units that are up-to-date, but can’t vote on the 2 in arrears.
Traditionally this owner carries a large number of proxies at the annual general meeting. Is there any legal way the body corporate can restrict the carrying of proxies owing to the fact that the 2 Units are in arrears with levy payments?
Carryn’s answer:
This owner has a vote for each of the 8 units for which he is not in arrears. There is currently no legal way to limit the number of proxies he may carry.
Prescribed management rule 13(g) states that a trustee who is in arrears for more than 60 days with any levies and contributions payable by him in respect of his unit or exclusive use area (if any) and if he fails to bring such arrears up to date within 7 days of being notified in writing to do so.
Therefore the trustee must of been in arrears for more than 60 days and also must fail to bring the arrears up to date after receiving 7 days’ notice to do so to be disqualified from being a trustee.
Article reference: Paddocks Press: Volume 10, Issue 3, Page 6.
Professor Graham Paddock, Anton Kelly, Carryn Durham and Zerlinda van der Merwe are available to answer questions on the Paddocks Club discussion forum for Community members. Get all your questions answered by joining Paddocks Club.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
1 Comment.
Hi, I have been looking at various responses to this matter. PMR 64 no longer applicable since the new Act and Regulations are in place.
PMR7 now in place. Which “rule” now prevent someone in arrears to vote?
Only PMR20(2) – but subject to a judgement or court order.
Or am I wrong?