The owners in community schemes generally make all the important decisions about how the scheme is run. They usually elect the scheme executives, in some types of schemes they approve a budget – meaning they effectively set the inevitable increase in the levy – and they make and change rules. All of these are very important decisions and they are made by resolution at a general meeting of owners.
But what if a member is not able to attend the meeting and really wants to contribute to the important discussions and take part in the decision making? Can he or she ask someone to represent them at the meeting? The common law of meetings does not include an automatic right for participants to appoint a proxy to attend the meeting, speak and vote on their behalf. Consequently, the right to appoint a proxy needs to be provided for in the legislation or governance documentation that applies to the meeting.
In sectional title schemes and home owners’ associations (HOAs) that are established as companies the legislation does make that provision, but in common law HOAs the constitution must make the provisions.
HOAs that are non- profit companies
The Companies Act, 71 of 2008 (the Act) is very specific about member proxies. It says firstly that members have the right to appoint a proxy. There is no reference to the MOI in this initial provision, which means that it is one of the unalterable provisions of the Act. The right cannot be taken away. A proxy appointment must be in writing and signed and dated by the member, can be made revocable or irrevocable, and is valid for one year unless another period is specified. If the member attends the meeting and acts directly as a member, the proxy appointment is suspended.
The Act accommodates the situation where the person appointed as a proxy is not able to attend the meeting. The member may either appoint more than one person to serve as proxy or may allow the proxy to delegate the authority. A copy of the proxy appointment document must be given to the company or a person representing the company, before it can be exercised. These provisions are alterable provisions and may be changed or excluded by the MOI.
If the company invites members to appoint as proxy a person or persons named in the invitation or in a proxy appointment document sent to the member, certain conditions must be met. The form must have space for the member to write a different name of their own choice as their proxy, there must be space for the member to give instructions on how to vote (which every proxy appointment should do anyway), the appointment must not be required to be irrevocable, and the appointment lasts only for the specified meeting.
Unlike in sectional titles legislation, the Act does not limit the number of proxies a person may hold in a company meeting but equally does not prevent the MOI from making that limitation.
Common law HOAs
HOAs that are common law associations must have provision in their constitutions for the appointment of proxies, otherwise the members do not have the right to do so. The provisions of the Act or of sectional title legislation or a combination of both could be used in drafting these items in the constitution, depending on what suits the specific HOA.
Clearly it is in the interests of HOA members that they be able to appoint proxies, but they should make every effort to attend meetings themselves. If they really are unable to do so, proxy appointments should always specify how to vote on each matter on the agenda.
If you have any difficulties or questions about proxies in your HOA, please contact consulting@paddocks.co.za for a no obligation quotation for advice.
Article reference: Paddocks Press: Volume 13, Issue 1, Page 02.
Anton Kelly is an extremely knowledgeable specialist Sectional Title and HOA teacher and consultant. Having been the lead teacher on all the Paddocks courses for the last 7 years, Anton lives and breathes Sectional Title and HOA law, all day every day. There are not many issues he hasn’t come across before.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
8 Comments.
Hi, case law prevents HOA’s from restricting the number of proxies a person can hold – Venter vs Silver Lakes Homeowners Association NPC.
Hi, case law prevents an HOA from restricting the number of proxies a person can hold – Venter vs Silver Lakes Homeowners Association NPC.
I cannot understand the rationale of proxies in a HOA not being limited, but in a sectional title situation, being limited to two per sec. title owner. Can you explain this?
Regards
DH
Hi David,
Thank you for your comment. We would love to help but unfortunately our consultants do not monitor this forum. Here’s what we recommend:
– We have Paddocks Club, an exclusive online club, headed by Prof Graham Paddock, to help you get answers to your questions about community schemes: http://club.paddocks.co.za/
– We offer a Free Basics of Sectional Title short course starting soon, where you can ask an expert related questions: http://www.paddocks.co.za/courses/free-basics-of-sectional-title/
– You could consult with the author via telephone for R390 for 10 minutes. Please call 0216863950.
Kind regards,
Paddocks
Can homeowners ban a proxy holder from attending the AGM.
Hi Bernard,
Thank you for engaging.
That’s a great question. This is something our attorneys would be able to assist with. Please email us on consulting@paddocks.co.za with regards to your matter, and we can provide you with a no-obligation quote, so that we can assist you.
Kind regards,
Paddocks
Can someone please answer this question?
Situation : proxy holder completes and lodges his/her proxies with the HOA office. Discovers later through inside information that he/she has voted for a person standing unopposed, goes back to the office and changes the proxies into a different nominated candidate’s name – is this legal?
Kind regards
Irene
Hi Irene,
Thank you for your comment. This would be something that our legal team would need to assist with. Please send the relevant details of the matter to consulting@paddocks.co.za and the team will provide a no-obligation quote for their assistance with your matter.
Kind regards
Paddocks