There are many problems with keeping pets in community schemes. We encounter them often on our various discussion forums and in our consulting business. This article is about joining a scheme without permission to keep your pets.
Pet owners’ love for their animals often blinds them at decision making time. Here are two stories that will hopefully raise awareness of the importance of keeping a clear head when making a decision about pets and living in a community scheme. These are basically true stories, I’ve just changed details that might identify the individuals and schemes involved
The Home Owners’ Association (HOA) with a no pets rule
Lucy’s husband works in Dubai and returns home for a few weeks every few months. She is therefore alone much of the time and depends on her two large dogs for protection as well as for companionship. Understandably, she is very attached to them.
Lucy and her husband decided to move from the city and looked at “country estate” HOAs in several different locations, both at the coast and inland. They settled on one, the only problem being that –strangely for a “country estate” – there is a blanket no pets rule in place. When they did the first viewing they saw a dog in the neighbour’s property and upon asking, the neighbour acknowledged that the dog was actually not allowed to be there. Both the seller and the estate agent said there was a no pets rule but that it was up for change at a coming meeting, so it was not a problem. Lucy said to them that if she couldn’t have her dogs there they would not buy, that the dog issue was a deal breaker.
In a later communication exchange the chairperson said bring the dogs but he could not give official permission because of the current rule. Lucy and her husband were repeatedly assured that the rule would be changed and the dogs wouldn’t be a problem. But they knew the rule was in place. And they made an offer, which was accepted. Of course, the rule was not changed and Lucy and her husband are now faced with a major problem in their lives.
The hard choice
Danny had been living with his mother while he was going through an awkward time financially but was ready to once again move out and get his own flat, so he started looking around and eventually settled on a flat owned by a family friend.
Of course the flat was very nice, conveniently close to work and had the standard sectional title pet rule, that is, occupiers can apply for permission from the trustees to keep a pet. This made the flat doubly attractive because Danny has owned Titan, a Yorkshire terrier, for nearly ten years. So Danny, sensibly following advice from a sectional title expert friend, asked the family friend owner to apply to the trustees for permission to bring Titan with him when he moves in. She did so, saying in her application that Danny and Titan had lived in a block of flats before without any problems.
The trustees actually asked for a reference for the dog and Danny approached the managing agents of the scheme in which he had lived previously, asking if they could supply a reference, which they very kindly did, saying that Titan had never been a disturbance or caused any kind of nuisance.
Imagine Danny’s disappointment and frustration when the trustees eventually refused permission for his pet. Danny signed the lease anyway, confident that he could prevail on the trustees to change their minds and allow him to keep Titan once they realised that the reference was true and Titan was in no way a nuisance.
Now Titan lives with granny and the best Danny can do to be with his old friend is to stay over at his mom’s place on the weekends. Which makes him sad.
Rules are real
In sectional title schemes the legislation makes it clear that the rules apply to and bind all owners and occupiers, and that includes tenants. In homeowners’ associations the member’s liability to comply with the rules is contractual. If you buy into an HOA, you are automatically a member of the association and therefore bound by that association’s rules. Either way, the executives of the scheme are equally bound to enforce the rules. When looking at a scheme, either as a prospective buyer or as a tenant, realise that the rules are enforced and that you have a very small chance of getting them changed.
Article reference: Paddocks Press: Volume 10, Issue 3, Page 2.
Anton Kelly is an extremely knowledgeable specialist Sectional Title and HOA teacher and consultant. Having been the lead teacher on all the Paddocks courses for the last 5 years, Anton lives and breathes Sectional Title and HOA law, all day every day. There are not many issues he hasn’t come across before.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
5 Comments.
Regarding the pet stories post. In your second story, owners are allowed to apply for permission to keep a pet. Surely trustees are not entitled to unreasonably withhold that permission. The facts of the story as laid out make it seem as if they were very unreasonable in that decision. If they can unreasonably withhold permission, effectively it means that the provision is meaningless.
Dear Anton,
This is more a question than a reply, but still pertains to pets.
We had an incident a week ago where a dead cat was found in front of someones garage – on common property.
Although our Rules clearly state that no pets may wander around the complex, cats are a constant “issue”.
Regardless, what is expected of the Trustees in such a situation?
Are the Trustees responsible to remove the carcass?
Are the Trustees responsible to find the owner of the deceased pet? (Some pet owners wish to have the remains).
If the Trustees are responsible, where is the carcass to be “kept” until the owner has been identified?
Any light you may be able to shed on the subject, will be much appreciated.
Regards
Sue
A kitten was purchased as animal therapy for an abused child, at the recommendation of psychiatrist and psychologist. The BC would not grant permission, even though the animal was kept indoors.
I argued on “permission being unreasonably withheld”.
Permission was granted – a happy ending for all!!
Hello Anton
I would like to know if it is discrimination against a disabled person who needs a service dog being told by the trustees that she cant keep the service dog on the premises of her section of the scheme. The dog does not bark and is inside all day. ” An owner or occupier suffering from a disability and who reasonably requires a guide, hearing or assistance dog must be considered to have the trustees’ consent to keep that animal in a section and to accompany it on the common property.” This rule is a vague as it gets. Can you possibly explain this rule.
Regards
Bernard
Hi Bernard,
Thank you for your comment. We would love to help but unfortunately do not give free advice. Here’s how we can help:
– We offer a Free Basics of Sectional Title 1-week short course. You’ll be able to ask your course instructor any related questions. Find out more here.
– We offer consulting via telephone for R490 for 10 minutes. Please call us on +27 21 686 3950.
– We have Paddocks Club, an exclusive online club, to help you get answers to your questions about community schemes. Find out more here.
Kind regards
Paddocks