The first lesson of economics is scarcity, there is never enough of anything to fully satisfy all those who want it, which is why one of the most valuable additions to any property is secure, and preferably covered, off street parking.
Unfortunately, many sectional title schemes lack the necessary space required to fully satisfy all those who need parking and as with any scarce resource, nasty fights and wild claims of ownership are bound to follow.
In these situations trustees often grapple with the best way to deal with the allocation of parking or they have to contend with owners challenging the legalities of existing parking arrangements.
I often hear about “informal” parking arrangements, which have been put in place by trustees who did not realise that they have no right to allocate permanent parking space, either formally or informally.
Trustees need to understand that there are only five ways in which parking bays can legally be allocated to owners and occupiers in a sectional title scheme. We broadly categorise these arrangements into three categories, namely exclusive use areas, lease agreements and temporary trustee consent.
Exclusive use area parking bays are the most common, but most misunderstood, type of arrangement. Two types of exclusive use rights exist, namely:
1. Firstly, exclusive use rights can be created in terms of section 27 of the Sectional Titles Act either by a developer on the opening of the register of a sectional title scheme, or a body corporate by creating new registered exclusive use areas on the authority of a unanimous resolution of its members. These types of exclusive use areas are shown on the scheme’s sectional plan and are registered in the Deeds Registry in the name of the person entitled to their use.
2. Section 10(7) & (8) of the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act provide for a second type of exclusive use rights. A developer or the body corporate can make management or conduct rules that confer rights of exclusive use on members of the body corporate. These exclusive use areas are shown on a scale layout plan included in the scheme’s rules. The rule must include a schedule showing to which owner each area is allocated and when a section is sold the exclusive use rights conferred upon that section are automatically transferred as part of the process. If exclusive use rights are conferred by the management rules, they can only be created and amended by a unanimous resolution of the body corporate. If they are conferred by the conduct rules, they can be amended by a special resolution of the body corporate.
Another manner in which a parking bay can be allocated is by way of a lease agreement entered into between the body corporate and an owner or occupier in terms of section 4(h) or section 5(1)(a) of the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act. Two types of lease agreements exist, namely:
3. Section 4(h) of the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act states that the body corporate may, upon special resolution, enter into a lease agreement with any owner or occupier of a section to let a portion of the common property. A lease entered into in terms of section 4(h) may only be offered to an owner or occupier of a section and may not be entered into a period of more than 10 years or be renewable indefinitely or renewable for periods, which amount in all to more than 10 years.
4. Section 5(1)(a) of the STSM Act states that the body corporate may, upon unanimous resolution, on direction by the owners and with the written consent of any holder of a right of extension let the common property or any part thereof under a lease for a period longer than 10 years. In this case the lessee need not be an owner or occupier, and the lease must be notarially executed and registered at the deeds registry.
The last way in which parking bays can be allocated to an owner or occupier is by the trustees granting that person temporary consent to use the parking.
5. According to prescribed conduct rule 3(1) an owner or occupier may upon the written consent of the trustees use a common property parking bay provided that this consent may only be for a specific period. This type of parking arrangement is therefore temporary and should only be used in the case of emergencies.
It is clear that any permanent parking arrangement on common property requires member approval and the trustees are not entitled to make these arrangements. This is because common property is jointly owned by all of the owners and therefore no person has an automatic right to exclusively own or use these areas.
Should your community scheme require any advice on how to correctly allocate parking or should you require assistance identifying potential illegal parking arrangements in your scheme please don’t hesitate to contact our consulting department at consulting@paddocks.co.za for a no-obligation quote to provide the necessary legal assistance.
Article reference: Paddocks Press: Volume 14, Issue 09.
Specialist Community Scheme Attorney (LLB, LLM), Auren Freitas dos Santos, has previously been a Portfolio Manager and a Legal & Compliance Officer of a large managing agency.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
6 Comments.
Very informative. Thank you
This article was very enlightening.
Thanks. It clears a lot of misunderstanding and will help to solve problems in our complex.
Why is it that only the Chairman of the complex had two visitors parking bays? My parking bay was removed from opposite my gate to a corner, very far from where I stay?
There is an owner who is using her undercover parking for storage of building materials, managing agents have issued a letter requesting the removal this but she refuses, what would our next step be?
Hi Gail,
Thank you for your comment. Our legal team would need to assist you with your query. Please send the details of the matter to consulting@paddocks.co.za for a no-obligation quote.
Kind regards
Paddocks