In this article, I will unpack the similarities and differences between the Sectional Titles Act 95 of 1986 (“the STA”), the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act 8 of 2011 (“the STSMA”) and the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act 9 of 2011 (“the CSOSA”), relating to levy collection in sectional title schemes. In doing this, we will take a look at the function of the trustees in determining and raising levies, the expenses which levies relate to, the types of levies and contributions recoverable, and the process of recovery of levies.
Let us first take a look at section 37 of the STA, setting out the functions of the body corporate which, in terms of section 39(1) of the STA, is performed by the trustees elected to represent the members of the body corporate. One of the most important functions of the trustees, is to establish, for administrative expenses, a fund for:
- the repair, upkeep, control, management and administration of the common property;
- the payment of rates and taxes, and other local authority charges for the supply of electric current, gas, water, fuel and sanitary, and other services to the building/s;
- any insurance premiums; and
- the discharge of any duty or fulfilment of any other obligation of the body corporate.
The trustees determine the amounts to be raised for the aforementioned purposes, and raise them by levying contributions on the owners, in proportion to their participation quotas.
Section 3 of the STSMA similarly sets out the functions of the body corporate which, in terms of section 7(1) of the STSMA, must be performed by the trustees.
The STSMA goes further by introducing the requirement for a reserve fund, containing amounts which are reasonably sufficient to cover the cost of future maintenance and repair of common property, but which are not less than such amounts as may be prescribed by the Minister in the Regulations of the STSMA, which is still in its draft form.
The STA and the STSMA provides that the trustees raise additional contributions on the owners who are entitled to the right of exclusive use, whether registered in terms of section 27 or created by the rules in terms of section 27A of the STA, as is estimated necessary to defray the costs of rates and taxes, insurance and maintenance, and the provision of electricity and water.
The STA and the STSMA further provides that the trustees require that the developer, who is entitled to extend the scheme in terms of a right reserved as set out in section 25(1) of the STA, to make reasonable, additional, contributions to the fund, as may be necessary to defray the costs of rates and taxes, insurance and maintenance, and the provision of electricity and water, of the part/s of common property affected by the reservation.
The STA provides that the liability for these contributions levied upon the members,accrues from the passing of a trustee resolution (for an article on the importance of this trustee resolution, take a look at “Levy contributions authorised by trustee resolution”), and may be recovered by the body corporate by action in Court of competent jurisdiction from the persons who were owners of units, holders of exclusive use areas, and holders of real rights of extension, at the time when such a resolution was passed. Provided that upon the change of ownership of a unit, exclusive use areas and real rights of extension, the successor in title becomes liable for the pro-rata payment of such contributions from the date of change of ownership.
Whereas the STSMA provides that contributions levied may be recovered by the body corporate by an application to an ombud, in terms of the CSOSA. In this regard, section 39 of the CSOSA sets out various prayers for relief which the ombud may make, including an order in respect of financial issues.
The STA and the STSMA provides that the trustees may from time to time, when necessary, make special levies / contributions upon the owners in respect of all such expenses not included in the budget for that financial year (see section 37(2B) of the STA and section 3(4) of the STSMA for a definition of “special contribution”).
The STA provides that any special contribution becomes due on the passing of a trustee resolution, and may be recovered by the body corporate by action in any competent court having jurisdiction, from the persons who were owners of units at the time when such resolution was passed. Whereas, the STSMA further provides that special contributions levied may be recovered by the body corporate by an application to an ombud.
In summary, the most noticeable amendments with regard to levy collection in sectional title schemes, is the future statutory requirement for a reserve fund for future maintenance and repair of common property, and the ability to apply to the Community Scheme Ombud Service for an order relating to the recovery of arrear contributions.
Should you have any queries or comments, please contact us at Paddocks on 021 686 3950 or at consulting@paddocks.co.za.
The Guide to CSOS Applications for Dispute Resolution
Paddocks has designed a free, online guide to assist you in understanding the CSOS, the types of orders it can grant and the process of putting together an application for dispute resolution. Click here to visit the guide and minimise the chance of your order being rejected unnecessarily.
Article reference: Paddocks Press: Volume 12, Issue 04, Page 02.
Zerlinda van der Merwe is an admitted Attorney of the High Court, specialist Sectional Title Attorney (BA, LLB, LLM), Zerlinda brings a wealth of experience and forms part of the Paddocks Private Consulting Division.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
1 Comment.
If the BC is paying CSOS levies, can the BC still bring arrear lies action in magistrates court OR by by the CSOS levies, does the BC then agrees to the jurisdiction of CSOS?