The Supreme Court of Appeal (“SCA”) recently handed down an important judgment in regard to the nature of a homeowners association’s right to prevent transfer when an owner is insolvent and unable to pay outstanding levies.The full citation of the case is: Willow Waters Homeowners Association (Pty) Ltd v Koka N.O. and Others (768/2013) [2014] ZASCA 220 (12 December 2014) if you are a Paddocks Club Member, download it from the Paddocks Club Library where it is available under the heading ‘Cases’ with other important sectional title and homeowners’ association case law. If you are not a Paddocks Club member and wish to have a copy of the case emailed to you please send your request to editor@paddocks.co.za.
The judgment in this case confirmed that a title deed condition that restrains an owner from transferring a property until the homeowners association issues a levy clearance certificate gives rise to a real right that is binding all persons, including the insolvent estate of an HOA owner and which in effect gives the HOA the right to prevent transfer until the amounts due to it by the insolvent are paid.In the two cases that the SCA reviewed in the appeal owners in HOAs had gone insolvent and in each case the trustee winding up the insolvent estate was not prepared to recognise that the HOA’s claim for outstanding levies must be paid in full as one of the costs of realisation of property. The trustees in these cases took the view that the HOA was an unsecured creditor and it’s claim was unsecured. Because there was not enough money in either of the insolvent estates to pay creditors, including the secured creditors like bondholders, this mean that the HOAs were facing a loss that would have had to be borne by the other HOA owners.
So this judgement, in which NAMA and ARC participated and raised arguments as amici curiae (interested parties), brings welcome clarity and confirmation of the position as practitioners have historically understood it. In the context of an HOA, a title deed condition that operates in favour of the HOA, restricting the owner’s right to transfer the property without the lodgement at the Deeds Registry of a HOA levy clearance certificate, has an effect similar to the provisions of section 15B the Sectional Titles Act, 1986: its effect is to restrain the owner’s right to transfer the property and it effectively gives the HOA an embargo on the property until the HOA’s claim has been paid or secured and it has issued a levy clearance certificate.
Article reference: Paddocks Press: Volume 10, Issue 1, Page 1.
Adjunct Professor Graham Paddock is the author of the Home Owners’ Association Survival Manual and the senior consultant at Paddocks, a sectional title and HOA specialist firm. For more information on the Home Owners’ Association Management course, click here.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
2 Comments.
Is a homeowners association rule, that damage casused by a visitor (say accidentally damaging gate on entry) is the liability of the resident, constitutional?
Dear Bernard,
Thank you for your comment. We are more than happy to help, however we do not give free opinions / advice. Please email us on consulting@paddocks.co.za with regards to your matter, and we can provide you with a no-obligation quote, so that we can assist you.
Kind regards,
Paddocks