Using solar geysers or panels to heat water is becoming more and more common in community schemes, as up to 50% of household electricity costs can be consumed by heating water. In addition, owners who have geysers inside their sections may be keen to move them outside, onto the common property where any leak will cause less damage.
A scheme’s conduct rules are the ideal mechanism to regulate the placement of owners’ geysers, solar panels and any associated water-heating piping, wiring, support brackets, covers and other equipment on common property in a standardised and aesthetically acceptable way, to avoid problems and unpleasantness. A trustee policy is more complex and liable to change. Prescribed management rule 31(1) does make owners responsible for the costs of maintenance and replacement of water-heating installations that serve their sections or exclusive use areas. However, it is best to have a rule that provides a wide scope of owner responsibility and takes account of the practical insurance aspects.
Is an owner’s water heating equipment part of the common property?
Graham Paddock and I both agree that the law regarding items owners attach to the common property is complicated, but the way to deal with the issue simply is to have a rule, or at least a written contract, recording the intention of the body corporate and the owner. The rule should confirm that the water-heating equipment the owner installs will form part of the common property, so that it is covered under the body corporate’s policy, but that the owner will bear all costs that arise from its installation. The rule should also confer exclusive use right on the owner and specify that its purpose is to house the geyser and/or solar power harvesting equipment. Ideally, the rule should allow all owners to do the same thing on similar areas of common property adjacent to their sections.
What about the body corporate’s insurance policy?
From an insurance perspective, it is best that the solar power harvesting equipment be part of the common property, subject to exclusive use rights and covered by the body corporate’s insurance policy. Each time more panels and geysers are added, the body corporate needs to formally notify the insurer. The rule needs to make it clear that each owner will pay the premium increase that results from adding these items and also any excess amount that is withheld when a claim is made on that equipment. The rule should also make the persons who install these systems liable for any other expenses that arise as a result of their being covered, or the increased number of claims that result. Prescribed management rule 31(1) and the proviso to section 3(1)(c) of the STSM Act ensure the owner is responsible to carry out and pay for repairs and maintenance, and the body corporate can recover any unexpected expenses that result from the installation in the exclusive use area. Under the body corporate’s policy, the water-heating equipment must be insured for normal perils.
Insurance definitions and policy wording
Insurers generally take the view that hot water installations, for which the owners are responsible, include the tank and its components plus the pipes within one metre of the tank, provided the geyser tank is not more than 300 litres. Any other part of the system is considered to form part of the buildings for normal perils cover.
There are various types of solar hot water heating systems. Some comprise a tank and solar panels installed close together, others are connected, but further apart. Some systems have elements heating the water and powered by batteries connected to solar panels. Other systems are even more complex. The scheme rule should always specify what parts of any system will be seen as parts of the hot water installation and therefore the owner’s responsibility and what parts, if any, will be considered the body corporate’s responsibility. Check the body corporate’s policy wording and definitions, and make sure any new insurer knows of the rule.
Role of the insurance broker
The insurance advisor or broker plays an important role in guiding trustees. There are three types of wordings commonly used in sectional title building policies.
- Traditional ‘combined’ or ‘material damages’ policies.
Where this type of policy is in place, it is more important to state the replacement costs and disclose these items which may need to be insured on an all-risk basis. The policy will usually be endorsed to accommodate the changes. - ‘All risk’ policies.
These are common newer policy wordings. All the water-heating installations are considered part of the building and covered automatically on an all-risk basis. They are insured for the usual perils, even theft—which will be limited, usually to around R20 000. - ‘All risk hybrid’ policy
These are even more recent policy wordings, based on traditional material damages policy wordings but with elements of all-risk policies. This type of policy usually includes more specific references to geysers and solar installations.
Record keeping implications
Owners’ water heating systems on the common property should be separate line items on the body corporate’s schedule of replacement costs and not be lumped in with the rest of the common property items. This assists the body corporate to recover any related costs from the owner.
In a recent installation that I advised on, the whole solar system cost the owner R150 000. This charged back-up batteries housed within the section and powered some appliances. The panels on the roof (R13 000) were shown as common property subject to exclusive use and the balance (R137 000) was an additional sum allocated to his section.
In another instance, a commercial office complex that included several tower blocks had a tenant who applied for permission to install solar panels on the roof, to take the business ‘off the grid’. The body corporate required that the owner take exclusive use rights to the rooftop.
Setting acceptable standards
One of the challenges with allowing owners to specify solar heating systems is the wide range of quality in equipment and suppliers. Cheaper systems and those assembled by owners with components from different suppliers may cause difficulties. When a water supply system fails, it often causes substantial damage to the surrounding common property and may also cause water damage to sections. Ideally a body corporate should reach an agreement and include in a rule for minimum standards, that will reduce the risk of frequent claims and failures.
Four steps to success
To do the job properly and keep risks within reason, trustees should:
- Consult with a reputable solar manufacturing and installation specialist. Assess the needs and get suitable specifications.
- Get a sectional title expert attorney, working with any managing agent, to draft the appropriate rule, resolution and agreements.
- If the body corporate is going to fund the installation, ensure it uses an experienced and reputable sectional title financier.
- Present the quotations and specifications to a sectional title specialist insurance advisor who can advise on the schedules of replacement values and policy to protect the body corporate’s interests.
Article reference: Paddocks Press: Volume 16, Issue 1.
Mike Addison is the director of Addsure – www.addsure.co.za – specialist sectional title insurance brokers.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
2 Comments.
Who would be responsible for the repairs to a Solar Panel Pump and would it for part of the plumbing inspection when the property is sold?
Hi Cheryl,
Thank you for your comment. This would be something that our legal team would need to assist with. Please send all the relevant details to consulting@paddocks.co.za and the team will provide a no-obligation quote for their assistance with this query.
Kind regards
Paddocks Team