There are two options open to developers and owners for creating exclusive use rights for particular areas of common property. Exclusive use areas (EUAs) are areas other than your sectional unit that are additional “nice to haves”, such as stores, garages, parking bays, gardens, etc. EUAs can be registered in the rules made by the developer upon opening the scheme’s register, or later by the body corporate or by registration of a notarial deed. The second method is regarded by attorneys and financial institutions as the “belt & braces” method. Basically, the rule is that if the EUA is of substantial value, like a basement garage for instance, then the banks can use that as additional collateral for the mortgage bond.
Very often it is left up to the land surveyor to advise the developer on whether garages, balconies and stores are measured in as part of the apartment sections or not. This decision is of particular importance as levies are generally raised on the measured floor area of a section and exclusive use areas are not included in this calculation. For instance, the value of a section in Clifton or Camps Bay may hinge on a magnificent balcony with outstanding views, but how the land surveyor measured up the section will dictate its “municipal valuation” and the extent of the individual owner’s liability to pay levies.
So, the land surveyor’s role is crucial in terms of how sectional title properties will be valued by municipalities. I believe that not enough time is spent by land surveyors, developers and attorneys in getting this “product mix” right at the inception of schemes, and it is left to bodies corporate and managing agents to try and rectify issues that arise afterwards.
Another area of caution for all concerned is registered real rights of extension in terms of section 25 of the Sectional Titles Act, 1986. If you have bought into a phased scheme, you should take extreme care to find out exactly what the end result will look like. It is exceptionally difficult for developers to predict what the demand for specific units will be in 5 or 10 years’ time. In a phased development, if a developer wishes to change the product mix, he must then revert to the body corporate for a unanimous resolution – and that is material enough for another article!
The Deeds Offices have tightened up tremendously in this regard and, if an amending plan does not agree pretty much exactly with the final development plan that was originally filed in the Deeds Office, then the developer runs the risk of his next phase not being registered on time and the Deeds Office calling for a unanimous resolution from the body corporate instead. This might place the developer in a situation where he faces financial ruin due to the potential delays in getting registration, caused by the vacillations of the body corporate. So, the final message to buyers is – beware, and to developers – plan extremely carefully for the future phases because you can’t afford to get it wrong.
Biff Lewis of Biff Lewis Geomatics Inc. is an authority in the field of sectional title surveying with over 30 years of experience in the field. Biff is one of the three presenters on the University of Cape Town Sectional Title Development Course. Click here for more information on this course.
Article reference: Volume 5, Issue 4, Page 1
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
2 Comments.
The recently published CSOS Act has prompted the Directors to review the Rules applicable to our complex. A question has arisen as to the status of the verges which lie between the kerbs of the roadways and the boundary walls of the Sections.
The complex is defined as a Cluster where each section is privately owned and surrounded by a boundary wall of brick. Owners are required to maintain the verges and are permitted to plant gardens including trees and other plants. However a discussion arose concerning parking of vehicles on such verges, one owner having denied a neigbour from parking a car of a visitor to the neighbour on his verge.
Please give a definitive ruling concerning the status of a verge in a Cluster Complex.
Kind regards
Dear John,
Thank you for your comment. We are more than happy to help, however we do not give free opinions / advice. Please email us on consulting@paddocks.co.za with regards to your matter, and we can provide you with a no-obligation quote, so that we can assist you.
Kind regards,
Paddocks