Over the last few weeks, we have been receiving numerous queries as to whether community schemes may withhold payment of levies to the Community Schemes Ombud Service (“the CSOS”). The answer is no, and this article will focus on the consequences of a community scheme’s failure to comply with the requirement of the payment of levies to the CSOS, as required in terms of the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act 9 of 2011 (“the CSOSA”).
The CSOS is funded by the levies collected from every registered community scheme in the country, including the fees for services rendered by the CSOS based on a cost recovery basis. Every community scheme already registered, in the process of registration, or still to register, has a legal statutory obligation, in terms of the CSOSA and its Regulations, to pay levies to the CSOS in the amounts as prescribed by the Minister, subject to any prescribed discounts or waivers which may be applicable.
These levies are required, in terms of the Regulations, to be paid over to the CSOS by community schemes every three months, following recovery from its members monthly. The levy is collected, subject to a maximum amount, and according to a formula. The formula is the lesser of R40.00 or 2% of the amount by which the monthly levy, charged by the scheme, exceeds R500.00. This means that individual units within a community scheme, where the monthly levies do not exceed R500.00, are effectively granted a 100% percentage waiver of the CSOS levies. Furthermore, any person or category of persons whose monthly net household income is below R5, 500.00 are also entitled to a 100% waiver of application and adjudication fees. Any person or category of persons who may not qualify in terms of the above criteria, may lodge an application for discount and/or waiver, for consideration by the Chief Ombud.
The scheme executives of community schemes must collect these monthly levies, calculated according to this formula, from every unit or erf within a community scheme, and pay the amounts collected to CSOS on a quarterly basis. Any community scheme that fails to pay a levy or any other amount due to the CSOS on the due date, must pay interest on that amount for the period it remains outstanding, at a rate prescribed by the National Credit Act.
The CSOSA has set out a number of requirements that must be complied with by community schemes across the country, and certain requirements have deadlines which must further be met. For example, every community scheme must register with the CSOS, providing them with their governance documentation and any other information that may be required to be completed and submitted; pay a levy to the CSOS, according to the aforementioned prescribed formula and recoverable from the members of the community schemes; and file its annual returns and copies of its annual financial statements with the CSOS.
In terms of section 34 of the CSOSA, there are various offences, which if contravened, may result in conviction. This section provides that any person associated with a community scheme or with the CSOS, may be found guilty of such an offence and may be liable, on conviction, to a fine or imprisonment for a period not exceeding 5 years, or to both a fine and such imprisonment. Should such a person be convicted for a second or subsequent conviction, for an offence, they may be liable to a fine or imprisonment for a period not exceeding 10 years, or to both a fine and such imprisonment.
As you can see from the above, it is vitally important for scheme executives and members to comply with the provisions of the CSOSA, as the consequences for non-compliance is far-reaching.
Should you require legal advice, or want to find out about our short courses, contact us via email at info@paddocks.co.za or consulting@paddocks.co.za or telephonically on 021 686 3950. For the month of September 2018, get a 21-minute telephonic consultation for only R775 (Incl.VAT).
View Prof. Graham Paddock’s video on CSOS levy raising, here, as well as his article titled “Why must I pay levies to CSOS?“.
Article reference: Paddocks Press: Volume 13, Issue 9.
Zerlinda van der Merwe is an admitted Attorney of the High Court, specialist Sectional Title Attorney (BA, LLB, LLM), Zerlinda brings a wealth of experience and forms part of the Paddocks Private Consulting Division.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
3 Comments.
What is CSOS doing to ensure all sectional title complexes are going ?
Hi David,
Thank you for your comment. We are not affiliated with the CSOS in any way, therefore cannot answer your question.
We recommend contacting them directly.
Kind regards,
Paddocks
I think many BCs and HOAs are concerned that – despite CSOS having been running for over a year now – they are still unable to generate any receipts, acknowledge receipt of payment or provide any reconciliation of amounts charged versus amounts paid on their system. (The first 3 payments we were required to make to them were before they issued us with a registration number and we were advised to use the complex name as our payment reference, They still cannot confirm that these amounts were received or that they were allocated to the correct scheme!) With all the corruption in SA, I guess we’re all concerned as to where our money is actually going! At what point are we able to insist that they get their accounting system on track? Do we have to go to the CSOS Ombudsman to request his assistance in ensuring that the CSOS Ombudsman is doing his job, haha! Let’s hope they get their accounting system sorted before someone has a chance to help themselves to funds that don’t belong to them.