This article will focus on the consequences of a community scheme’s failure to comply with some of the requirements of the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act 9 of 2011 (“the CSOSA”).
The CSOSA has set out a number of requirements that must be complied with by community schemes across the country, and certain requirements have deadlines which must further be met.
For example, every community scheme must register with the Community Schemes Ombud Service (“the CSOS”), providing the CSOS with their governance documentation and any other information that may be required to be completed and submitted to the CSOS; pay a levy to the CSOS, according to a prescribed formula and recoverable from the members of the community schemes; and file its annual returns and copies of its annual financial statements with the CSOS.
In terms of section 34 of the CSOSA, there are various listed offences, which, if contravened, may result in conviction. This section provides that any person, associated with a community scheme or with the CSOS, may be found guilty of such an offence, and may be liable, on conviction, to a fine or imprisonment, for a period not exceeding 5 years, or to both a fine and such imprisonment. Should such a person be convicted for a second, or subsequent conviction, for a listed offence, they may be liable to a fine or imprisonment, for a period not exceeding 10 years, or to both a fine and such imprisonment.
The listed offences are:
- The failure to provide access to any of the scheme’s records, including its books of account;
- The failure to comply with a directive issued by the Chief Ombud;
- The failure or refusal to give the required information, or the giving of false or misleading information;
- The refusal to perform a duty or the prevention of someone from performing a duty in terms of the CSOSA;
- The acceptance of an unauthorised fee or reward in connection with a position within the CSOS;
- Making use of the name, design of logo of CSOS without permission to do so;
- The failure to comply with the fiduciary duties of the CSOS, and the unauthorised disclosure of the information of the CSOS.
As you can see from the above, it is vitally important for scheme executives and members to comply with the provisions of the CSOSA, as the consequences for non-compliance is quote far-reaching.
Should you have any queries relating to this topic, require legal advice, or want to find out about our courses, contact us via email at consulting@paddocks.co.za or telephonically on 021 686 3950.
The Guide to CSOS Applications for Dispute Resolution
Paddocks has designed a free, online guide to assist you in understanding the CSOS, the types of orders it can grant and the process of putting together an application for dispute resolution. Click here to visit the guide and minimise the chance of your order being rejected unnecessarily.
Article reference: Paddocks Press: Volume 12, Issue 07, Page 02.
Zerlinda van der Merwe is an admitted Attorney of the High Court, specialist Sectional Title Attorney (BA, LLB, LLM), Zerlinda brings a wealth of experience and forms part of the Paddocks Private Consulting Division.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
8 Comments.
Very interesting reading. As a Body Corporate we have been trying to communicate with CSOS have sent all our documents as required but to date have had no response whatsoever. Its like talking to a robot with dead ears. What do you suggest as a last resort. We want to comply its so frustrating.
Regards Charles Mare
Dear Sir . I found that the only way to get assistance with the Community Ombudsman is to go to their Regional office in person and take up space and pace up and down , talk loudly on your cell phone and make them feel on edge.
We have had exactly the same experience. Have sent all the necessary documents to the Ombud well in time and have not heard a word. We are collecting the CSOS levies but do not know what to do about paying them as we have not received a registration number.
We submitted the application for registration to CSOS.
We have had no response.
we have trying to follow up – no response as yet please advise on what you suggest we do.
We cannot pay levy over without registration number.
The original owner/developer has not paid levies since the building became a Sectional Title. We went to CSOS and they issued a court order for him to pay all the moneys owed from day one into the body corporate. However, he has ignored the instruction from CSOS. He did not attend the arbitration or adjudication meetings and also did not submit an objection to the ruling to the high court. What do we do now? Are we responsible to appoint an attorney?
Hi Vivienne,
Thank you for your comment. We would love to help, however we do not give free advice. Here’s how we can help:
– We offer consulting via telephone for R490 for 10 minutes. Please call us on 021 686 3950.
– We have Paddocks Club, an exclusive online club, to help you get answers to your questions about community schemes.
Kind regards,
Paddocks
Interesting article.is there a complaint process against CSOS I. E. In the event where they didn’t follow their own process and called an adjudication hearing before the conciliation process? Just because the complainant had an inside man they know?
I logde URGENT complains Application to CSOS . SIX months later after a lot of mails, we got EVENTUALLY GOT conciliation date. Respondents failed to attend. Week later we got arbiteation date for 5 April: week later arbitration date was cancelled..excuse…will be set down for later date. Now a month, still no date -reason given ‘ will be notified. Now nearly 8 months and still waiting whilst financial & other managent issues just get worse. What is there problem delaying such matters for months on end????? Wasting time and depency on their supposed assistance AND OVERSEEING give Lawful in rulings of non compliace to STMA.
A lot can happen in 8 months??????