We all know times are tough, and the reality is that some people cannot afford to pay their levies. They should sell, and as quickly as possible, but often they hold on too long and run up major debt to the body corporate in the form of unpaid levies. Once the legal fees are added, the amount escalates very quickly and owners can find themselves owning their bondholder and the body corporate a total that is greater than the value of their unit.
Recently I was asked whether a body corporate should accept a unit in exchange for writing off a sectional owner’s debt of more than R400 000,00.
The first problem with this suggestion is a technical one. A body corporate is not like a company that can do anything a person can do. It is a statutory body that only has the powers given to it under the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act of 2011. While this Act does allow a body corporate to acquire a unit, it limits this power to circumstances where the acquisition is “essential for the proper fulfilment of its duties” and also requires that the proposed acquisition be approved by special resolution. So a body corporate does not have the power to accept the owner’s offer, if the only reason is to settle the owner’s debt.
But even if the body corporate had the power to acquire the unit, it is still very unlikely to be a good idea. Writing off any body corporate claim, prejudices all other owners in the scheme, as they must fund its expenses including any losses. The body corporate should insist that its full claim be satisfied, at least until it is quite sure that the owner is actually insolvent and the body corporate’s claim is not recoverable.
When owners fall into substantial arrears, the body corporate should launch an application with the Community Schemes Ombud Service. There need be no legal cost involved, the administrative cost is minimal and an adjudicator’s order can be used as if it were a High Court or a Magistrates Court order.
If you have any questions on this topic or need any assistance in this regard, don’t hesitate to contact us at consulting@paddocks.co.za for a no obligation quotation.
Graham Paddock is South Africa’s Sectional Title Guru. Graham advises and drafts legislation for the Government. His advice is valued by all stakeholder groups in the industry.
Article reference: Paddocks Press: December 2019.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
3 Comments.
Does the body corporate have to approach CSOS first,or can they go direct to the regional to claim the levy arrears?
My name is Johann, I am the chairman of the “WESTGATE” BODY CORP. in Vanderbijlpark. The building is old , built in 1983. It is well maintain and in good condition. We have a case of an deceased estate, that just do not seem to be finalized.The deceased was a U.K. citizen, from a wealthy family and an outcast. They do not seem to be interested in ± R250 000.00 minus cost etc. sitting RSA. The legal route may be costly. It also appeared to me as if our local attorneys are reluctant to take on the case…Our levies are ± R 1 800.00p.m. and very resonable in todays market. However the estates debt is now exceeding R 50 000.00. = Any advice will be most welcome.
Then my second query;- Our garages are classified, for lack of a better term, as ‘common property’.
All are allocated to the unit. Thus;- Door number correspond to garage number.
In 2005 a owner managed to swop his garage number 11 with garage number 19…
He claims the then chairman authorised it…- No minutes or proof of a body corp meeting.
Unit number 19 is in the process of being sold.
Based on the history that unit numbers and garage numbers correspond, the new owner insists on getting garage number 19. Unit number 11 just stubbornly refuses…
I have called for a body corp meeting;- I asked both parties to motivate there cases. My question…
Can the trustees ;- (a) Make the 2005 decision by the then chairman nul and void?
(b) Make a ruling that unit numbers and garage number stay de facto legally linked?
Hi Johann,
Thank you for your comment. However, we do not provide free advice. Please email us on consulting@paddocks.co.za with regards to your matter, and we can provide you with a no-obligation quote, so that we can assist you.
Kind regards,
Paddocks