Following the attention the concept of special levies has enjoyed in the media over the past few weeks, the question on every sectional title unit owner’s lips seems to be: “If I did not agree to a special levy being raised, how can the body corporate possibly add this additional amount to my levy statement?” The question often goes hand-in-hand with a strong opinion that such contributions cannot possibly be legally due and payable.
This opinion seems to be reinforced by some owners’ opinion that trustees no longer have the authority to raise special levies at all, due to the fact that the cost of maintenance and repairs should be provided for in the scheme’s ten year maintenance, repair and replacement plan and should be included in the scheme’s reserve fund budget.
While it is true that special levies should not be raised to pay for routine maintenance expenses such as the painting of the building, special levies are still very much a part of our law. The trustees still have the power to raise special contributions from members in certain circumstances, but these circumstances are limited.
In order for a board of trustees to legally implement a special contribution, the following criteria has to be met:
- The trustees need to pass a written trustee resolution to raise such contributions
- The special contributions have to be required to meet an expense that is necessary
- The special contributions have to be required to meet an expense that is urgent
A classic example of a case where special contributions can, and should be raised is when a storm damages a part of the common property roof, and as a result of the damaged roof, the sections beneath it suffer water damage. If the trustees take action without delay, the damage will be limited, saving the body corporate costs in the long run, while a postponement of the repair works until after the budget for the next financial year has been approved at the next AGM will mean that the body corporate will have to pay both the repair costs and the section owners’ (now much bigger) claim for damages.
If the trustees pass a written trustee resolution to levy members with a special contribution to cover unbudgeted expenditure that is necessary and cannot reasonably be delayed until provided for in the following financial year’s budget, the trustees do not need to consult with the owners. The levy will be legally due and payable despite a lack of consent by any or all members. However, if the trustees implement a special levy without meeting this criteria, the owners can approach the Community Schemes Ombud Service for relief.
Should you require any advice on how to obtain such relief, or wish to discuss any related matter with a specialist community schemes attorney, don’t hesitate to contact our consulting department at consulting@paddocks.co.za for a no-obligation quote to provide the necessary legal assistance.
Article reference: Paddocks Press: Volume 14, Issue 05.
Specialist Community Scheme Attorney (BA (Law) LLB), Ané de Klerk, combines her work experience as a Portfolio Manager with knowledge of conveyancing and community scheme law.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
Recent Comments