I recently presented a workshop during which I discussed with those in attendance the requirement and importance of having members of bodies corporate cast their votes on voting cards at the scheme’s general meetings. Some of the feedback I received from managing agents attending the workshop included “But we have been voting by show of hands for years” and “It is just much less admin for us to do it that way”. Others offered the argument that the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act never explicitly states that voting must be done in any other way.
Of course my first order of business was to point these managing agents to the fact that the prescribed management rules require that voting cards be issued to those present at any general meeting. I don’t believe there could be any reasonable argument that the intention of the legislature was for voting cards to be issued, but not used. Therefore the argument that the words “members must cast their votes on voting cards” are missing from the Act and prescribed rules cannot be used to justify a vote by show of hands.
What’s more, we know that ordinary resolutions are passed by the majority of members in value and that a special resolution must be passed by at least 75% of members calculated in both number and value. Without knowing exactly which members voted for and against the resolution and the value of the votes cast by those owners, how could one possibly be sure of the value of the votes cast? Counting raised hands quite simply will not prove effective.
The last, and in my opinion most important, reason for using voting cards to cast votes is that it can be kept as proof. Especially given the fact that relevant roleplayers are now able to approach the Community Schemes Ombud Service for relief pertaining to resolutions either unreasonably opposed or, on the flip side of that coin, challenge the validity of resolutions purportedly passed, it is more important that ever to keep proof of how the votes were cast.
While the scheme may have been doing things a certain way for many years, it only takes one person (perhaps a new owner) to challenge the validity of a purportedly passed resolution for the whole house of cards to come tumbling down. Why risk it?
Make sure you issue and use voting cards at your next general meeting to prevent problems which could so easily have been avoided.
Article reference: Paddocks Press: Volume 15, Issue 3.
Specialist Community Scheme Attorney (BA (Law) LLB), Ané de Klerk, combines her work experience as a Portfolio Manager with knowledge of conveyancing and community scheme law.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Graham Paddock on Body Corporate Functions: Insurance
- Graham Paddock on Spending body corporate funds
- Graham Paddock on The Levy Clearance Certificate: The Body Corporate’s Cheap & Effective Weapon
- Graham Paddock on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
- Heinz Wiesner on The benefits of online sectional title meetings
Archives
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- February 2008
- February 2007
6 Comments.
Very good article. A question arises as to how we determine “Value” in an HOA.
Are there any examples where this was implemented as a yardstick?
Hi Douglas,
Thank you for engaging.
That’s a great question. This is something our attorneys would be able to assist with. Please email us on consulting@paddocks.co.za with regards to your matter, and we can provide you with a no-obligation quote, so that we can assist you.
Kind regards,
Paddocks
In the case of a proxy, the member may need to indicate her/his vote on the voting card, as the proxy would not
necessarily know what the member would vote for. In that case, I would say that the member should also hand the completed voting card to the proxy prior to the meeting. Will this be acceptable or what other option is available in the case of proxies?
Dear Anè, how do you use “voting cards” in a virtual meeting?
Hi Benji,
Thank you for your comment. Please note that our legal team would need to advise on this. Please contact consulting@paddocks.co.za and the team will provide a no-obligation quote for their assistance with your matter.
Kind regards
Paddocks
Great read. Does Paddocks offer a template for voting cards? As MA do we list the voting items on the AGENDA on the card?